Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. State Furniture Co. of Winston-Salem, 409 F.2d 1359 (4th Cir. 1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. State Furniture Co. of Winston-Salem, 409 F.2d 1359 (4th Cir. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fugit v. Commissioner (tax, 1975-05-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Fugit v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1975 · confidence medium
Ferrer, 50 T.C. 177 , 182 (1968) , affd. per curiam 409 F.2d 1359 *239 (2d Cir., 1969); Donald H.
cited Cited "see" Robertson v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ferrer v. Commissioner, 50 T.C. 177 , 185 (1968) , affd. per curiam 409 F.2d 1359 (2d Cir. 1969) .
discussed Cited "see" VAKSMAN
unknown court · Rob · signal: see · confidence high
See Ferrer v. Commissioner, 50 T.C. 177 , 185 (1968) , affd. per curiam 409 F.2d 1359 (2d Cir. 1969) ; see also Tokarski v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 74 , 77 (1986) ("we are not required to accept the self-serving testimony of petitioner * * * as gospel").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Westinghouse Credit Corporation
v.
State Furniture Company of Winston-Salem, Inc., State Furniture Company of Mount Airy, Inc., State Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc., State Furniture Company of Reidsville, Inc., and State Furniture Company of North Wilkesboro, Inc.
13004.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 17, 1969.
409 F.2d 1359
Published

409 F.2d 1359

WESTINGHOUSE CREDIT CORPORATION, Appellee,
v.
STATE FURNITURE COMPANY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Inc., State Furniture Company of Mount Airy, Inc., State Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc., State Furniture Company of Reidsville, Inc., and State Furniture Company of North Wilkesboro, Inc., Appellants.

No. 13004.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 10, 1969.

Decided April 17, 1969.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem; Eugene A. Gordon, Judge.

Eugene H. Phillips, Winston-Salem, N. C., for appellants.

Walter Rand, III, Greensboro, N. C., (Herbert S. Falk, Jr., and Falk, Carruthers & Roth, Greensboro, N. C., on brief), for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

This is an action upon a contract dated May 24, 1962, as amended September 5, 1963, under which Westinghouse Credit Corporation purchased certain sales accounts receivable of the State Furniture Company corporations. The purchase was subject to provisions for recourse against State in the event an account debtor defaulted in his payments. It was to enforce these provisions that Westinghouse brought this suit against State. Final judgment was entered for the plaintiff by the District Court after a jury-waived trial.

2

On review we see no error in the fact findings of the Court or in its interpretation of the contract. They are clearly set out in the two opinions of the District Judge, and upon them we affirm the orders on review. See Westinghouse Credit Corporation v. State Furniture Company et al., 298 F.Supp. 567, 570 (1968).

3

Affirmed.