Texas Comm. On Nat. Resources v. United States, 430 F.2d 1315 (5th Cir. 1970). · Go Syfert
Texas Comm. On Nat. Resources v. United States, 430 F.2d 1315 (5th Cir. 1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest negative: Pennsylvania Environmental Council, Inc. v. Bartlett (ca3, 1971-12-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" Pennsylvania Environmental Council, Inc. v. Bartlett
3rd Cir. · 1971 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Texas Committee on Natural Resources v. United States, (W.D.Tex. 1970) dismissed as moot and vacated 430 F.2d 1315 (5th Cir. 1970), reprinted in O.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Texas Committee on Natural Resources
v.
United States of America, J. Lynn Futch, State Director, Farmers Home Administration, Lakeview Recreation Association and J. R. Singleton, Executive Director, Texas Parks & Wildlife Department
1315.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 25, 1970.
430 F.2d 1315
Published

430 F.2d 1315

TEXAS COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, J. Lynn Futch, State Director,
Farmers Home Administration, Lakeview Recreation
Association; and J. R. Singleton, Executive Director, Texas
Parks & Wildlife Department, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 28962 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, et al., 5th Cir., 1970,

431 F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 25, 1970.

Edward C. Fritz, Dallas, Tex., Sam Houston Clinton, Austin, Tex., for appellants.

Roger Tyler, Vince Taylor, Austin, Tex., Seagal V. Wheatley, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., H. J. Cureton, Meridian, Tex., Alan S. Rosenthal, Reed Johnston, Jr., Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellees.

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

A group of conservationists instituted this action to enjoin the United States and its duly constituted agencies from disbursing the proceeds of a loan for the construction of a golf course in Meridian State Park, Texas.

2

After trial, the District Court dismissed the suit.

3

Subsequently, the appellees have abandoned all plans for the construction of the golf course in Meridian State Park and have entered into a binding contract for the purchase of private land to be used for said purposes.

4

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot and vacate the decision and direct its dismissal so that the judgment will spawn no legal consequences. See United States of America v. Knippers and Day Real Estate, Inc., 5 Cir., 1970, 425 F.2d 1081 and the cases there cited.

5

The judgment below is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the proceedings as moot.

6

Vacated, remanded with directions.