Eerik Heine v. Juri Raus, 432 F.2d 1007 (4th Cir. 1970). · Go Syfert
Search
Eerik Heine v. Juri Raus, 432 F.2d 1007 (4th Cir. 1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eerik HEINE, Appellant,
v.
Juri RAUS, Appellee
14281.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Oct 30, 1970.
432 F.2d 1007
Robert J. Stanford and Ernest C. Raskauskas, Washington, D. C., for appellant., Paul R. Connolly, Washington, D. C. (J. Alan Galbraith, and Williams & Connolly, E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., and Hogan & Hartson, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellee.
Haynsworth, Winter, Craven.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

On remand the district court fairly resolved the question of authority and ratification left open by our prior decision, Heine v. Raus, 399 F.2d 785 (4th Cir.[*1008] 1968). Thereupon he entered summary-judgment in accordance with the law of the case.

Affirmed.