United States v. Certain Space in the Prop. Known as the Chimes Bldg., Syracuse, Onondaga Cnty., State of New York, 435 F.2d 872 (2d Cir. 1970). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Certain Space in the Prop. Known as the Chimes Bldg., Syracuse, Onondaga Cnty., State of New York, 435 F.2d 872 (2d Cir. 1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Robert E. Derecktor of Rhode Island, Inc. (rib, 1992-06-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In Re Robert E. Derecktor of Rhode Island, Inc.
Bankr. D.R.I. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Certain Space in Syracuse, New York, 320 F.Supp. 491, 496 (D.C.N.Y.1969), aff'd, 435 F.2d 872 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 908 , 91 S.Ct. 1381 , 28 L.Ed.2d 649 (1971); Mayo v. Pioneer Bank and Trust Co., 168 F.Supp. 503, 518 (W.D.La.1958).
discussed Cited "see" Ambassador Factors, Division Fleet Factors Corp. v. First American Bulk Carrier Corp. (In re Topgallant Lines, Inc.)
D. Ga. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Certain Space in Syracuse, New York, 320 F.Supp. 491, 496 (N.D.N.Y.1969), aff'd, 435 F.2d 872 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 908 , 91 S.Ct. 1381 , 28 L.Ed.2d 649 (1971); See also Mayo v. Pioneer Bank and Trust Co., 168 F.Supp. 503 at 518 (W.D.La.1958) (stating that the Act is “purely for the protection of the government”).
discussed Cited "see" Matter of Topgallant Lines, Inc.
Bankr. S.D. Ga. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Certain Space in Syracuse, New York, 320 F.Supp. 491, 496 (N.D.N.Y.1969), aff'd, 435 F.2d 872 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 908 , 91 S.Ct. 1381 , 28 L.Ed.2d 649 (1971); See also Mayo v. Pioneer Bank and Trust Co., 168 F.Supp. 503 at 518 (W.D.La.1958) (stating that the Act is "purely for the protection of the government").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Certain Space in the Property Known as the Chimes Building, Syracuse, Onondaga County, State of New York
34674_1.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Dec 1, 1970.
435 F.2d 872
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

435 F.2d 872

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CERTAIN SPACE IN the PROPERTY KNOWN AS the CHIMES BUILDING, SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 96.

Docket 34674.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued October 8, 1970.

Decided December 1, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Edmund Port, Judge.

1

John B. Carroll, Syracuse, N. Y. (Nottingham, Carroll, Paltz, Coughlin & Conan and Adolph H. Huttar, Syracuse, N. Y., on the brief), for appellants Walter J. Sampson, Bernard Greenbaum, Abner J. Mesirow and Walter A. Bogeaus, d/b/a Southeastern Industrial Dist.

2

William L. Allen, Jr., Syracuse, N. Y. (Hancock, Estabrook, Ryan, Shove & Hust, Syracuse, N. Y., on the brief), for defendant-appellee City Investing Co.

3

Dirk D. Snel, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Shiro Kashiwa, Asst. Atty. Gen., James M. Sullivan, Jr., U. S. Atty., Samuel T. Betts, III, Asst. U. S. Atty., Syracuse, N. Y., and Raymond N. Zagone, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee United States of America.

4

Melvin & Melvin, Syracuse, N. Y., on the brief for Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United States, defendant-appellee.

5

Before MOORE, SMITH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

6

The judgment of the district court is affirmed, substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Port's opinion. 320 F.Supp. 492 (1969).