green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Skoko v. Andrus
See also, United States v. City of Glen Cove, E.D.N.Y., 1971, 322 F.Supp. 149, 155 , aff'd, 2 Cir., 1971, 450 F.2d 884 ; cf. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United States, 1933, 290 U.S. 89, 94-95 , 54 S.Ct. 38 , 78 L.Ed. 192 ; Adaman Mutual Water Company v. United States, 9 Cir., 1960, 278 F.2d 842, 849-50 ; Columbia Irrigation District v. United States, 9 Cir., 1959, 268 F.2d 128, 131-32 . 25 Whatever the Congress did to alleviate the loss of tax revenues suffered by the O & C counties when the O & C lands were revested in the United States was an act of grace on the part of the Congress.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Skoko v. Andrus
See also, United States v. City of Glen Cove, E.D.N.Y., 1971, 322 F.Supp. 149, 155 , aff’d, 2 Cir., 1971, 450 F.2d 884 ; cf. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United States, 1933, 290 U.S. 89, 94-95 , 54 S.Ct. 38 , 78 L.Ed. 192 ; Adaman Mutual Water Company v. United States, 9 Cir., 1960, 278 F.2d 842, 849-50 ; Columbia Irrigation District v. United States, 9 Cir., 1959, 268 F.2d 128, 131-32 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
City of Glen Cove, Long Island, New York
v.
City of Glen Cove, Long Island, New York
249.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Nov 29, 1971.
450 F.2d 884
Published
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CITY OF GLEN COVE, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK, et al.,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. 249, Docket 71-1785.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Nov. 29, 1971.
Decided Nov. 29, 1971.
Peter H. Morrison, New York City (Morrison, Paul & Beiley, Edward Farman, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellants.
Bruno A. Ristau, Atty., Department of Justice (L. Patrick Gray III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert A. Morse, U. S. Atty. for Eastern District of New York, Morton Hollander, Atty., Department of Justice, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Before LUMBARD, WATERMAN and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
We affirm on the opinion of Judge Judd reported at 322 F.Supp. 149 (E.D.N.Y.1971).