green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Klotz v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
See, David v. New York Telephone Company (S.D.N.Y. 1972) 341 F.Supp. 944 , aff’d, 468 F.2d 632 , supplemented, 470 F.2d 191 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hartford Consumer Activists Association v. Hausman
See, David v. New York Telephone Co., 341 F.Supp. 944 (S.D.N.Y.1972), aff’d, 468 F.2d 632 (2d Cir. 1972), supplemented, 470 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1972). *1281 Procedural Aspects of the Rate Hearing In addition to the plaintiffs’ direct attack on the PUC’s interim rate order, they contend that certain procedural aspects of the hearing on the full rate increase violated their right to due process.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Levy
v.
Levy
72-1904.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Nov 16, 1972.
468 F.2d 632
Published
U. S.
v.
Levy
72-1904
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit
Nov. 16, 1972
1
S.D.N.Y.