Sam H. Johnson v. Penrod Drilling Co., James L. Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co., 478 F.2d 1208 (5th Cir. 1973). · Go Syfert
Sam H. Johnson v. Penrod Drilling Co., James L. Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co., 478 F.2d 1208 (5th Cir. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Opportunity Homes, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner (ca6, 1997-02-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Opportunity Homes, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner (2×)
6th Cir. · 1997 · confidence medium
Caterers, Inc., 478 F.2d 1208, 1209 (6th Cir.1973).
cited Cited as authority (rule) National Labor Relations Board v. Cutter Dodge, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1987 · confidence medium
NLRB v. Johnson’s Industrial Caterers, Inc., 478 F.2d 1208, 1209 (6th Cir.1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sam H. Johnson
v.
Penrod Drilling Company, James L. Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Company
71-2243.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
May 18, 1973.
478 F.2d 1208
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

478 F.2d 1208

Sam H. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PENROD DRILLING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
James L. STARNES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PENROD DRILLING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 71-2243 and 71-2245.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

May 18, 1973.

John M. Smith, Longview, Tex., Mat M. Gray, III, New Orleans, La., Sam B. Hall, Jr., Marshall, Tex., Joseph W. Milner, Shreveport, La., for defendant-appellant.

Scott Baldwin, Marshall, Tex., Joseph D. Jamail, Gus Kolius, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Nov. 21, 1972, 5 Cir., 1972, 469 F.2d 897)

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the Judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2

It is ordered that these causes shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.