Indiana & Michigan Elec. Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 479 F.2d 920 (D.C. Cir. 1973). · Go Syfert
Indiana & Michigan Elec. Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 479 F.2d 920 (D.C. Cir. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
153 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 70 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hospital (minn, 1999-08-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hospital (2×)
Minn. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bredice v. Doctors Hosp., Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249, 250 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd without opinion, 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973) (“Constructive professional criticism cannot occur in an atmosphere of apprehension that one doctor’s suggestion will be used as a denunciation of a colleague’s conduct in a malpractice suit.”); Holly v. Auld, 450 So.2d 217, 220 (Fla.1984) (“A doctor questioned by a review committee would reasonably be just as reluctant to make statements, however truthful or justifiable, which might form the basis of a defamation action against him as he would be to proffer opinion…
cited Cited "see" Burrows v. Redbud Community Hospital District
N.D. Cal. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff’d 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973).
cited Cited "see" In Re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia on December 20, 1995
S.D. Fla. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd without op., 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973).
cited Cited "see" Todd v. South Jersey Hospital System
D.N.J. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973).
cited Cited "see" Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
D.D.C. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd, 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973). 8 .
cited Cited "see" In Re the Proposed Suspension, Revocation or Non-Renewal of the Nursing Home Licenses of Parkway Manor Healthcare Center
Minn. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249, 250 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd, 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973); Kalish, 270 N.W.2d at 785 .
cited Cited "see" In re \K\""
N.H. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249, 250 (D.D.C. 1970), aff’d 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.
cited Cited "see" Plough, Inc. v. National Academy of Sciences
D.C. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff’d, 156 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 479 F.2d 920 (1973); Mewborn v. Heckler, 101 F.R.D. 691 (D.D.C.1984); D.C.Code § 32-505 (1981). 5 .
cited Cited "see" Humana Hospital Desert Valley v. Superior Court
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Misevch, 113 Ariz. at 38 , 545 P.2d at 962 , citing Bredice v. Doctors Hosp., 50 F.R.D. 249, 250 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd, 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973).
discussed Cited "see" Murphy v. Wood (2×)
Idaho Ct. App. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 , 51 F.R.D. 187 (D.C.Dist. 1970), aff'd. 479 F.2d 920 (1973).
cited Cited "see" Emerson Electric Co. v. Schlesinger
8th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff’d, 156 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973).
cited Cited "see" Robinson v. Magovern
W.D. Pa. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 51 F.R.D. 187 (D.D.C.1970), aff’d, 156 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 479 F.2d 920 (1973). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cornu-Labat v. Hosp. Dist. No. 2 of Grant County
Wash. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
See RCW 7. 71.01 0; see also Coburn v. Seda, 101 Wn.2d 270, 275 , 677 P.2d 173 (1984) ('"Candid and conscientious evaluation of clinical practices is a sine qua non of adequate hospital care."' (quoting Bredice v. Doctors Hasp., Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249, 250 (D.D.C. 1970) aff'd, 156 U.S. App. D.C. 199 , 479 F.2d 920 (1973))). "[E]xtemal access to committee investigations stifles candor and inhibits constructive criticism thought necessary to effective quality review." Anderson v. Breda, 103 Wn.2d 901, 905 , 700 P.2d 737 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dye v. St. John Hospital & Medical Center
Mich. Ct. App. · 1998 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Davidson v. Light, 79 F.R.D. 137 (D.Colo., 1978), with Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C., 1970), aff'd without opinion 156 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 479 F.2d 920 (1973)." Comparing the Davidson and Bredice precedents, as directed by Monty , we reject plaintiff's conclusion that materials relating to the provision of staff privileges are outside the purview of the statutes.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." First Eastern Corp. v. Mainwaring
D.C. Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Bank argues initially that the district court decision is justified by the so- called self-evaluative privilege which encourages “confidential self-analysis and self-eriti-eism.” Federal Trade Comm’n v. TRW, Inc., 628 F.2d 207, 210 (D.C.Cir.1980); see also Bredice v. Doctors Hosp., Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd, 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." First Eastern Corporation v. Mainwaring
1st Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
In a brief order, the district court granted the motion to quash the subpoena, holding that "the documents are subject to a qualified privilege which, under the circumstances, is more important to preserve than the documents are essential to petitioners' case." II. 5 The Bank argues initially that the district court decision is justified by the socalled self-evaluative privilege which encourages "confidential self-analysis and self-criticism." Federal Trade Comm'n v. TRW, Inc., 628 F.2d 207, 210 (D.C.Cir.1980); see also Bredice v. Doctors Hosp., Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd, 479 F.2…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." CPC INTERN. v. Hartford Acc.
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Wylie, supra, 195 N.J.Super at 338, 478 A. 2d 1273, citing Roberts v. National Detroit Corp., 87 F.R.D. 30 (E.D.Mich. 1980); See also, Gillman v. United States, 53 F.R.D. 316 (S.D.N.Y. 1971) (Note that all three cases stress that factual information should not be protected by this qualified privilege.) The doctrine was first articulated in Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C. 1970), aff'd. on rehearing, 51 F.R.D. 187 (D.D.C. 1970), aff'd, 479 F. 2d 920 (D.C.Cir 1973), a medical malpractice action.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Indiana & Michigan Electric Company
v.
Federal Power Commission
72-2168.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jun 19, 1973.
479 F.2d 920
Published

479 F.2d 920

156 U.S.App.D.C. 199

Indiana & Michigan Electric Company
v.
Federal Power Commission

72-2168

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit

6/19/73

1

D.C.D.C.

DISMISSED