green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hospital
(2×)
See Bredice v. Doctors Hosp., Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249, 250 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd without opinion, 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973) (“Constructive professional criticism cannot occur in an atmosphere of apprehension that one doctor’s suggestion will be used as a denunciation of a colleague’s conduct in a malpractice suit.”); Holly v. Auld, 450 So.2d 217, 220 (Fla.1984) (“A doctor questioned by a review committee would reasonably be just as reluctant to make statements, however truthful or justifiable, which might form the basis of a defamation action against him as he would be to proffer opinion…
cited
Cited "see"
Burrows v. Redbud Community Hospital District
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff’d 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia on December 20, 1995
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd without op., 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Todd v. South Jersey Hospital System
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd, 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973). 8 .
cited
Cited "see"
In Re the Proposed Suspension, Revocation or Non-Renewal of the Nursing Home Licenses of Parkway Manor Healthcare Center
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249, 250 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd, 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973); Kalish, 270 N.W.2d at 785 .
cited
Cited "see"
In re \K\""
See generally Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249, 250 (D.D.C. 1970), aff’d 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Plough, Inc. v. National Academy of Sciences
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff’d, 156 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 479 F.2d 920 (1973); Mewborn v. Heckler, 101 F.R.D. 691 (D.D.C.1984); D.C.Code § 32-505 (1981). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
Humana Hospital Desert Valley v. Superior Court
See Misevch, 113 Ariz. at 38 , 545 P.2d at 962 , citing Bredice v. Doctors Hosp., 50 F.R.D. 249, 250 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd, 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Murphy v. Wood
(2×)
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 , 51 F.R.D. 187 (D.C.Dist. 1970), aff'd. 479 F.2d 920 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
21 Fair empl.prac.cas. 475, 21 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,390 Emerson Electric Company v. James A. Schlesinger, Lt. General Wallace Robinson, Philip J. Davis, Ray Marshall, John H. Powell, Jr., McDonnell Douglas Corporation, a Corporation v. Ray Marshall, Secretary, U. S. Department of Labor John H. Powell, Jr., Chairman, Eeoc Philip J. Davis, Director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance James W. Cisco, Deputy Chief, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Dcasr Robert T. Horner, Chief, Office of Contract Compliance Dcasr, St. Louis and Eugene P. Keenan, District Director, Eeoc, St. Louis
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), Aff'd, 156 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Emerson Electric Co. v. Schlesinger
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff’d, 156 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Robinson v. Magovern
See Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 51 F.R.D. 187 (D.D.C.1970), aff’d, 156 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 479 F.2d 920 (1973). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cornu-Labat v. Hosp. Dist. No. 2 of Grant County
See RCW 7. 71.01 0; see also Coburn v. Seda, 101 Wn.2d 270, 275 , 677 P.2d 173 (1984) ('"Candid and conscientious evaluation of clinical practices is a sine qua non of adequate hospital care."' (quoting Bredice v. Doctors Hasp., Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249, 250 (D.D.C. 1970) aff'd, 156 U.S. App. D.C. 199 , 479 F.2d 920 (1973))). "[E]xtemal access to committee investigations stifles candor and inhibits constructive criticism thought necessary to effective quality review." Anderson v. Breda, 103 Wn.2d 901, 905 , 700 P.2d 737 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dye v. St. John Hospital & Medical Center
Compare Davidson v. Light, 79 F.R.D. 137 (D.Colo., 1978), with Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C., 1970), aff'd without opinion 156 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 479 F.2d 920 (1973)." Comparing the Davidson and Bredice precedents, as directed by Monty , we reject plaintiff's conclusion that materials relating to the provision of staff privileges are outside the purview of the statutes.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First Eastern Corp. v. Mainwaring
The Bank argues initially that the district court decision is justified by the so- called self-evaluative privilege which encourages “confidential self-analysis and self-eriti-eism.” Federal Trade Comm’n v. TRW, Inc., 628 F.2d 207, 210 (D.C.Cir.1980); see also Bredice v. Doctors Hosp., Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd, 479 F.2d 920 (D.C.Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First Eastern Corporation v. Mainwaring
In a brief order, the district court granted the motion to quash the subpoena, holding that "the documents are subject to a qualified privilege which, under the circumstances, is more important to preserve than the documents are essential to petitioners' case." II. 5 The Bank argues initially that the district court decision is justified by the socalled self-evaluative privilege which encourages "confidential self-analysis and self-criticism." Federal Trade Comm'n v. TRW, Inc., 628 F.2d 207, 210 (D.C.Cir.1980); see also Bredice v. Doctors Hosp., Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C.1970), aff'd, 479 F.2…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
CPC INTERN. v. Hartford Acc.
Wylie, supra, 195 N.J.Super at 338, 478 A. 2d 1273, citing Roberts v. National Detroit Corp., 87 F.R.D. 30 (E.D.Mich. 1980); See also, Gillman v. United States, 53 F.R.D. 316 (S.D.N.Y. 1971) (Note that all three cases stress that factual information should not be protected by this qualified privilege.) The doctrine was first articulated in Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 50 F.R.D. 249 (D.D.C. 1970), aff'd. on rehearing, 51 F.R.D. 187 (D.D.C. 1970), aff'd, 479 F. 2d 920 (D.C.Cir 1973), a medical malpractice action.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Indiana & Michigan Electric Company
v.
Federal Power Commission
v.
Federal Power Commission
72-2168.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jun 19, 1973.
Published
Indiana & Michigan Electric Company
v.
Federal Power Commission
72-2168
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit
6/19/73
1
D.C.D.C.
DISMISSED