neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.5 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, and Bartenders and Culinary Workers Union, Intervenor,
v.
HOWARD JOHNSON COMPANY, Respondent
v.
HOWARD JOHNSON COMPANY, Respondent
73-2927.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
May 15, 1974.
Elliott Moore, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D. C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, Region 20, NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner., Robert V. Magor, Severson, Werson, Berke & Melchior, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.
Merrill, Ely, Goodwin.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
OPINION
PER CURIAM:The petitioning Board’s Decision and Order is reported at 198 NLRB No. 98. It was issued by the full Board, without dissent.
We have carefully reviewed the record. From that record, together with the reported opinion of the full Board, our conclusion is that the Order should be, and therefore will be,
Enforced.