green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
18.3 score
“less sophisticated investors”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Harris Trust And Savings Bank v. E-Ii Holdings, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
less sophisticated investors
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. E-II Holdings, Inc.
less sophisticated investors
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. Herrmann
“Dismissal for lack of jurisdiction is not appropriate merely because the legal theory alleged is probably false, but only because the right claimed is ‘so insubstantial, implausible, foreclosed by prior decisions of this Court, or otherwise completely devoid of merit as not to involve a federal controversy.’” Growth Horizons, Inc. v. Delaware County, Pa., 983 F.2d 1277, 1280 (3d Cir.1993) (quoting Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida, 414 U.S. 661, 666 , 94 S.Ct. 772, 776 , 39 L.Ed.2d 73 (1974)) (internal quotations and other citations omitted); cf. Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Iue Afl-Cio Pension Fund v. Thomas Herrmann
"Dismissal for lack of jurisdiction is not appropriate merely because the legal theory alleged is probably false, but only because the right claimed is 'so insubstantial, implausible, foreclosed by prior decisions of this Court, or otherwise completely devoid of merit as not to involve a federal controversy.' " Growth Horizons, Inc. v. Delaware County, Pa., 983 F.2d 1277, 1280 (3d Cir.1993) (quoting Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida, 414 U.S. 661, 666 , 94 S.Ct. 772, 776 , 39 L.Ed.2d 73 (1974)) (internal quotations and other citations omitted); cf. Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 137…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,288 William S. Flickinger v. Harold C. Brown & Co., Inc. And Bradford Broker Settlement, Inc., N/k/a Fidata Corporation
Thus the claim is sufficient for jurisdictional purposes, Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1380 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 364 , 46 L.Ed.2d 282 (1975), so that the state law claims may be considered. *599 2.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Don King Productions, Inc. v. Douglas
To hold it acceptable for such a promoter to lead a fighter to the ring, only to then act partially to influence the fight outcome against the same fighter's interest, does not appear to comport with the notion of fair dealing that inheres in every contract. 28 Such an act may have the direct “effect of destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract.” Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1385 (2d Cir.) (quoting Kirke LaShelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co., 263 N.Y. 79, 87 , 188 N.E. 163, 167 (1933)), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 364 , 46 …
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hartford Fire Insurance v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.
This implied covenant means that “ ‘neither party shall do anything which will have the effect of destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract.’ ” Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1383-85 (2d Cir.) (quoting Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co., 263 N.Y. 79, 87 , 188 N.E. 163, 167 (1933)), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 364 , 46 L.Ed.2d 282 (1975); see also Broad v. Rockwell Int’l Corp., 642 F.2d 929 (5th Cir.) (“The covenant is breached only when one party to a contract seeks to prevent its performance by, or to withh…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bloch v. Prudential-Bache Securities
See State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corp., 654 F.2d 843, 851 (2d Cir.1981); Van Gemert v. Boeing, 520 F.2d 1373, 1382, n. 19 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 364 , 46 L.Ed.2d 282 (1975); Weinberger v. New York Stock Exchange, 335 F.Supp. 139, 144 (S.D.N.Y.1971).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Simons v. Cogan
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
See, e.g., Katz v. Oak Industries, Inc., Del.Ch., 508 A.2d 873, 878-80 (1986), note 7 (1986); Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1383 (2d Cir.1975) (applying New York law).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Gearhart Industries, Inc. v. Smith International, Inc.
Apr. 16, 1984), aff’d. 744 F.2d 255 at 267-69 (2d Cir. 1984); Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373,1381 (2d Cir.1975); Sonesta Int’l.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.
See Friedman v. Airlift International, Inc., 44 A.D.2d 459 , 355 N.Y.S.2d 613 (1st Dep’t 1974); Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1383 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 364 , 46 L.Ed.2d 282 (1975), appeal after remand, 553 F.2d 812, 813 (2d Cir.1977) (applying New York law).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. 11 Cornwell Company
See also Friedman v. Berger, 547 F.2d 724 , 727 & n. 6 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 984 , 97 S.Ct. 1681 , 52 L.Ed.2d 378 (1977); Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1380-82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 364 , 46 L.Ed.2d 282 (1975). 19 Section 1985(3) provides in part as follows: 20 If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire ... for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws ... the party so injur…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People of New York v. 11 Cornwell Co.
See also Friedman v. Berger, 547 F.2d 724 , 727 & n. 6 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 984 , 97 S.Ct. 1681 , 52 L.Ed.2d 378 (1977); Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1380-82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 364 , 46 L.Ed.2d 282 (1975).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Pittsburgh Terminal Corp. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Observing that the newspaper notice that was provided “may have conformed to the requirements of the Indenture,” the court nonetheless concluded that such notice “was simply insufficient” under New York’s fair dealing law “to give fair and reasonable notice to the debenture holders.” 520 F.2d at 1383.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,706 Pittsburgh Terminal Corporation v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, W. James Price, Alonzo G. Decker, Jr., James Parker Nolan, Frederick Deane, Jr., James L. O'keefe, Gregory S. Devine, Fay A. Le Favre, Nicholas T. Camicia, Dr. Milton S. Eisenhower, Steven Muller, John K. Stevenson, Hays T. Watkins, Howard E. Simpson and Cyrus S. Eaton, All Directors or Former Directors of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, the Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad And/or the Chessie System, the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company and Chessie System, Inc. Monroe Guttmann, Loretta Guttmann, Janet Rees and Evelyn Bittner v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, W. James Price, Alonzo G. Decker, Jr., James Parker Nolan, Frederick Deane, Jr., James L. O'keefe, Gregory S. Devine, Fay A. Le Fevre, Nicholas T. Camicia, Dr. Milton S. Eisenhower, Steven Muller, John K. Stevenson, Hays T. Watkins, Howard E. Simpson and Cyrus S. Eaton, All Directors or Former Directors of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, the Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad And/or the Chessie System, the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company and Chessie System, Inc
Observing that the newspaper notice that was provided "may have conformed to the requirements of the Indenture," the court nonetheless concluded that such notice "was simply insufficient" under New York's fair dealing law "to give fair and reasonable notice to the debenture holders." 520 F.2d at 1383.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Defendants
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
The debenture holder’s expectancy is that he will receive reasonable ' notice and it is his reliance on this expectancy that the courts will protect. 520 F.2d at 1385 (citations omitted). 12 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Van Gemert v. Boeing Co.
(2×)
In our Circuit’s first opinion reversing the dismissal of the complaint after trial, Judge Oakes commented that, “[m]ost of the facts are not in dispute; indeed, we commend the parties, and the court below, for agreeing to a 59-page statement as to facts; incorporating some 55 exhibits, and to what certain witnesses would testify if called at trial.” Van Gemert, supra, 520 F.2d at 1375 (2d Cir. 1975) (Oakes, J.).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,956 David Broad v. Rockwell International Corporation
(5×)
also: Cited "see"
E. g., Rowe v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 46 N.Y.2d 62, 68 , 385 N.E.2d 566, 569 , 412 N.Y.S.2d 827, 830 (1978); Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1383-85 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 364 , 46 L.Ed.2d 282 (1975), appeal after remand, 553 F.2d 812, 815 (2d Cir. 1977) (applying New York law).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corp.
(3×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1382 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 364 , 46 L.Ed.2d 282 (1975).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,720 William R. Van Gemert v. The Boeing Company (Formerly the Boeing Airplane Company)
(2×)
Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1383 (2d Cir. 1975) [Van Gemert I].
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,483 the Indiana National Bank and Merchants National Bank & Trust Company of Indianapolis v. Mobil Oil Corporation
Plaintiff also relies on Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1383 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 364 , 46 L.Ed.2d 282 (1975), to support the conclusion that actual notice was required.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Franklin Life Insurance v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
Van Gemert, supra, n. 13, at 1376-1377. 15 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,371 William R. Van Gemert v. The Boeing Company (Formerly the Boeing Airplane Company)
(2×)
Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1378, 1383 (2d Cir.) (Van Gemert I ), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 97 S.Ct. 364 , 46 L.Ed.2d 282 (1975).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Green v. Hamilton International Corp.
The debenture holder relies on the opportunity to make a proper conversion on due notice.” Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1385 (2d Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Lantz v. Wedbush, Noble, Cooke, Inc.
VanGemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1381 (2d Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
County of Morris v. Fauver
See Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 364 , 46 L.Ed.2d 282 (1975); New Brunswick Savings Bank v. Markouski, 123 N.J. 402, 423-426 , 587 A.2d 1265 (1991); Rudbart v. North Jersey District Water Supply Commission, 127 N.J. 344, 379-380 , 605 A.2d 681 (1992) (concurring opinion).
discussed
Cited "see"
Van Alen v. Dominick & Dominick, Inc.
See generally Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1380-82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 364 , 46 L.Ed.2d 282 (1975); Colonial Realty Corp. v. Bache & Co., 358 F.2d 178, 180-82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 817 , 87 S.Ct. 40 , 17 L.Ed.2d 56 (1966); Wolfson & Russo, The Stock Exchange Member: Liability for Violation of Stock Exchange Rules, 58 Calif.L.Rev. 1120 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,136, 2 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 168 Candace Van Alen, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Dominick & Dominick, Inc., and Paul Degive, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants
See generally Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1380-82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 364 , 46 L.Ed.2d 282 (1975); Colonial Realty Corp. v. Bache & Co., 358 F.2d 178, 180-82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 817 , 87 S.Ct. 40 , 17 L.Ed.2d 56 (1966); Wolfson & Russo, The Stock Exchange Member: Liability for Violation of Stock Exchange Rules, 58 Calif.L.Rev. 1120 (1970). 15 We need not reach the question here, however.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barbara Girard v. 94th Street and Fifth Avenue Corporation
(2×)
See also Van Gemert v. Boeing Co., 520 F.2d 1373, 1382 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 364 , 46 L.Ed.2d 282 (1975). 1 Appellant’s complaint cites New York Executive Law § 296(5)(a)(l) (McKinney 1974) as the source of her state law claim. 2 However, this section of the New York Human Rights Law is not enforceable in federal court, but is part of an administrative scheme which is administered by the state Division of Human Rights.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Joseph L. BURNETT, Appellant
v.
Joseph L. BURNETT, Appellant
75-1325.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Dec 15, 1975.
520 F.2d 1373
Tyce S. Smith, Springfield, Mo., filed brief for appellant., Donald J. Stohr, U. S. Atty., Ronald E. Jenkins, Sp. Atty., U. S. Dept, of Justice, St. Louis, Mo., filed brief for appellee.
Lay, Per Curiam, Stephenson, Webster.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
PER CURIAM.
The only issue raised on appeal relates to the proper authorization of special prosecuting attorneys appearing before a grand jury. This issue has recently been decided by this Court wherein we held that the authorization by the Attorney General was proper. See United States v. Agrusa, 520 F.2d 370 (8th Cir. 1975); United States v. DiGirlomo, 520 F.2d 372 (8th Cir. 1975) and United States v. Wrigley, 520 F.2d 362 (8th Cir. 1975).
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.