green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Commodity Futures v. EOX Holdings
(2×)
But if so, “it is the regulation as written which must bear the blame.” Diamond Roofing Co., 527 F.2d 645 at 650.
cited
Cited "see"
Bracco v. Lackner
See Ostrow Pharmacies, Inc. v. Beal, 394 F.Supp. 22,24 (E.D.Pa.), aff’d, 527 F.2d 645 (3d Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scott Paper Co. v. United States
See also Pfotzer v. United States, 396 F.Supp. 961, 965 (D.Del.1975) (“[A] taxpayer is confined to the scope of the grounds asserted in his refund claim filed with the IRS and anything not raised in that claim cannot be raised later in a suit for a tax refund”), aff'd, 527 F.2d 645 (3d Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Town Sound & Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
See also Mogul v. General Motors Corp., 391 F.Supp. 1305, 1313 (E.D.Pa.1975) (relevant product market could not be limited to Cadillacs), aff’d without published opinion, 527 F.2d 645 (3d Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Town Sound And Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation
See also Mogul v. General Motors Corp., 391 F.Supp. 1305, 1313 (E.D.Pa.1975) (relevant product market could not be limited to Cadillacs), aff'd without published opinion, 527 F.2d 645 (3d Cir.1976). 44 Most tellingly, in this case Chrysler has offered unrebutted affidavits confirming what everyone who watches television or goes to an automobile dealership already knows--that Chrysler cars compete vigorously with many other companies' automobiles.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neugebauer v. A. S. Abell Co.
See also Mogul v. General Motors Corp., 391 F.Supp. 1305, 1314 (E.D.Pa.1975), aff’d, 527 F.2d 645 (3d Cir. 1976); Schwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Co., 138 F.Supp. 899, 906 (D.Md.), aff’d, 239 F.2d 176 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957) (“. . .a real monopoly in the commodity [is necessary] and not the natural monopoly which a manufacturer has in his own product”).
Starr
v.
Gorski
v.
Gorski
75-1377.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jan 12, 1976.
527 F.2d 645
Published
Starr
v.
Gorski
75-1377
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit
1/12/76
W.D.Pa., 378 F.Supp. 193
AFFIRMED