Imp. Motors Ltd. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 63 C.C.P.A. 56 (C.C.P.A. 1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Imp. Motors Ltd. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 63 C.C.P.A. 56 (C.C.P.A. 1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“substance, not form, must control.”
53 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n (In Re Amarin Pharma, Inc.) (cafc, 2019-05-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Under fire — who is questioning this case
Citations from separate opinions of courts that could overrule this case. This is a warning signal, not a treatment change. The flag color above is unaffected.
Dissent Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n (In Re Amarin Pharma, Inc.) (2019)
“Amgen , 902 F.2d at 1535 (emphasis omitted) (citing, inter alia, 530 F.2d at 944 ).”
Concurrence Sealed Air Corp. v. U.S. International Trade Commission (1981)
“Import Motors Ltd. v. U.S. International Trade Commission, 63 CCPA 57, 530 F. 2d 940 , 188 USPQ 491 (1976).”
Dissent Canadian Tarpoly Co. v. U.S. International Trade Commission (1981)
“The ITC has no published rules pertaining to a par. 3 type proceeding. 19 U.S.C. 1337(c) reads in part: Any person adversely affected by a final determination of the Commission under subsection (d), (e), or (f) of this section may appeal such determination to the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals In Import Motors, Ltd. v. U.S. International Trade Commission, 63 CCPA 57, 530 F.…”
Dissent InterDigital Communications, LLC v. International Trade Commission (2013)
“See Import Motors, Ltd. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 63 CCPA 56, 530 F.2d 940 , 944 (1976).”
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n (In Re Amarin Pharma, Inc.) (6×) also: Cited as authority (rule), Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Cir. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
substance, not form, must control.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Lsi Corporation v. Itc
Fed. Cir. · 2015 · confidence medium
Cir. 1985), in support of its no- jurisdiction argument, but neither case involved a situa- tion similar to the present one: Import Motors involved a preliminary denial of participation to certain persons who could intervene later in the proceeding, 530 F.2d at 946; and Block involved an abatement of proceedings and LSI CORPORATION v. ITC 11 The present situation does not involve the exercise of this court’s discretion about dealing with mootness aris- ing in the Article III courts.
examined Cited as authority (rule) InterDigital Communications, LLC v. International Trade Commission (5×) also: Cited "see"
Fed. Cir. · 2013 · confidence medium
It contravenes Import Motors and its progeny, which establish that a party may appeal an ITC order that is not a final decision on the merits if “its effect upon appellants is the equivalent of a final determination.” Import Motors, 530 F.2d at 944.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Crucible Materials Corp. v. United States International Trade Commission
Fed. Cir. · 1997 · confidence medium
Block v. United States Int’l Trade Comm’n, 777 F.2d 1568, 1571 , 228 USPQ 37, 38 (Fed.Cir.1985) (quoting Import Motors, Ltd. v. United States Int’l Trade Comm’n, 63 C.C.P.A. 56 , 530 F.2d 940 , 944, 188 USPQ 490, 494 (1976)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Crucible Materials Corporation v. United States International Trade Commission, and San Huan New Materials High Tech, Inc., Ningbo Konit Industries, Inc., and Tridus International, Inc., Intervenors. San Huan New Materials High Tech, Inc., Ningbo Konit Industries, Inc., and Tridus International, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission, and Crucible Materials Corporation, Intervenor
Fed. Cir. · 1997 · confidence medium
Block v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 777 F.2d 1568, 1571 , 228 USPQ 37, 38 (Fed.Cir.1985) (quoting Import Motors, Ltd. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 63 C.C.P.A. 56 , 530 F.2d 940 , 944, 188 USPQ 490, 494 (1976)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Seagate Technology, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission
Fed. Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
Import Motors Ltd. v. U.S. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 530 F.2d 940 , 944 188 USPQ 490, 494 (CCPA 1976) (emphasis added).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Beloit Corporation v. United States International Trade Commission, and Valmet Oy and Valmet Paper MacHinery Inc., Intervenor
Fed. Cir. · 1988 · confidence medium
Block v. United States International Trade Commission, 777 F.2d 1568 (Fed.Cir.1985); Import Motors Ltd., Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission, 530 F.2d 940, 944 , 188 USPQ 490, 494 (CCPA 1976), 19 U.S.C.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) John R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture v. U.S. International Trade Commission (2×)
Fed. Cir. · 1985 · confidence medium
Import Motors Ltd. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 530 F.2d 940 , 944, 188 USPQ 490, 494 (CCPA 1976) (emphasis added).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Import Motors Limited, Inc., World-Wide Volkswagen Corp., Riviera Motors, Inc., and Porsche Audi Northwest, Inc.
v.
United States International Trade Commission, and Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corporation
No. 76-3 C.A.D. 1165.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.
Jan 22, 1976.
63 C.C.P.A. 56
Harvey Kaye (Spencer & Kaye) attorney of record, for appellants., Rex E. Lee, Assistant Attorney General, William Kanter, Michael H. Stein, attorneys of record, Appellate Section, Civil Division
Claims, Kunzig, Lane, Markey, Miller, Rich.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
Markey, Chief Judge.

To facilitate the proceedings of the Commission, the court hereby announces its decision on this appeal. An opinion will follow in due course.

DECISION

The appeal is dismissed.

The stay of further proceedings set forth in the Order of this court dated December 3, 1975 (530 F. 2d 937, 188 USPQ 102 (CCPA 1975)), is vacated.