green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.4 score
“a stockholders' derivative suit charging fraudulent or improper action on the part of the corporation's directors, which seeks relief against them as individuals, cannot proceed in the absence of proper joinder of the directors as defendants.”
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
CRTF Corp. v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.
a stockholders' derivative suit charging fraudulent or improper action on the part of the corporation's directors, which seeks relief against them as individuals, cannot proceed in the absence of proper joinder of the directors as defendants.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tunis Bros. Co., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
(2×)
See Kaiser v. General Motors Corp., 396 F.Supp. 33, 38-39 (E.D.Pa.1975), aff'd 530 F.2d 964 (3rd Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
City of Philadelphia v. Bullion
See generally, Miller v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, 394 F. Supp. 58, 62 (1975), aff’d., 530 F.2d 964 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Feld v. Tele-View, Inc.
See Miller v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 394 F.Supp. 58 (E.D.Pa.1975), aff’d, 530 F.2d 964 (3d Cir. 1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eckenrod, Appeal Of
75-2187.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Feb 13, 1976.
530 F.2d 964
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
Eckenrod, Appeal of
75-2187
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit
2/13/76
1
W.D.Pa.
AFFIRMED