Wolgin v. Atlas United Fin. Corp, 530 F.2d 966 (3rd Cir. 1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Wolgin v. Atlas United Fin. Corp, 530 F.2d 966 (3rd Cir. 1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a guest without payment has been construed by the delaware courts to be akin to a 'social guest' recognized at common law as distinguished from business invitee.”
45 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Arthur v. Cummings (delsuperct, 2025-08-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Arthur v. Cummings
Del. Super. Ct. · 2025 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a guest without payment has been construed by the delaware courts to be akin to a 'social guest' recognized at common law as distinguished from business invitee.
cited Cited "see" Joel Popkin & Co. v. Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates, Inc.
D.D.C. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wolgin v. Atlas United Financial Corp., 397 F.Supp. 1003, 1014 (E.D.Pa.1975), aff'd mem., 530 F.2d 966 (3d Cir.1976) (applying the Pennsylvania rule on anticipatory breach).
discussed Cited "see" Jonnet Development Corp. v. Dietrich Industries, Inc.
Pa. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See 4 Corbin on Contracts § 959, p. 852-856 (1951).” Wolgin v. Atlas United Financial Corp., 397 F.Supp. 1003, 1014 (E.D.Pa.1975), aff'd, 530 F.2d 966 (3d Cir.1976); Cameron v. Eynon, 332 Pa. 529 , 3 A.2d 423 (1939); Parliament Industries, Inc. v. William H.
cited Cited "see" Caperton v. Beatrice Pocahontas Coal Co.
4th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wolgin v. Atlas United Financial Corp., 397 F.Supp. 1003, 1011-1013 (E.D.Pa.1975), affirmed, 530 F.2d 966 (3 Cir. 1976); 3 Moore’s Federal Practice UK 15.08[3], [4] (Second Ed. 1978).
cited Cited "see" Gladys Caperton as Representative of a Class of Property Owners Having More Than $10,000 Damage Living in Buchanan County, Virginia, in the Areas Adjacent to the Beatrice & Virginia Pocahontas Shaft Mines Numbers 1-5 Which Damage is Alleged to Exist and Have Been Caused by the Mining Operations of the v. Beatrice Pocahontas Coal Company And/or Virginia Pocahontas Coal Company And/or Island Creek Coal Company, Jones & Laughlin Steel Company, Republic Steel Corporation, Harold T. Powers and Kathy Jo Powers, His Wife v. Beatrice Pocahontas Company, Jones & Laughlin Steel Company, Republic Steel Corporation, Harry Ferrell and Florene P. Ferrell v. Beatrice Pocahontas Company And/or Virginia Pocahontas Company, And/or Island Creek Coal Company, Jones & Laughlin Steel Company, Republic Steel Corporation, Ira Cunningham Mutter v. Beatrice Pocahontas Company And/or Virginia Pocahontas Company And/or Island Creek Coal Company, Jones & Laughlin Steel Company, Republic Steel Corporation
4th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wolgin v. Atlas United Financial Corp., 397 F.Supp. 1003, 1011-1013 (E.D.Pa.1975), Affirmed, 530 F.2d 966 (3 Cir. 1976); 3 Moore's Federal Practice PP 15.08(3), (4) (Second Ed. 1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wolgin
v.
Atlas United Financial Corp
75-2020.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Feb 10, 1976.
530 F.2d 966
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 77%
Citer courts: Superior Court of Delaware (1)

530 F.2d 966

Wolgin
v.
Atlas United Financial Corp.

75-2020

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit

2/10/76

E.D.Pa., 397 F.Supp. 1003

AFFIRMED