Pollack v. United States, 568 F.2d 770 (3rd Cir. 1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Pollack v. United States, 568 F.2d 770 (3rd Cir. 1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Miller v. Badgley (washctapp, 1988-05-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Miller v. Badgley
Wash. Ct. App. · 1988 · confidence medium
Pa. 1977), aff'd, 568 F.2d 770 *295 (3d Cir. 1978).
discussed Cited "see" Weil v. Murray
S.D.N.Y. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sessa v. Riegle, 427 F.Supp. 760, 767 (D.C.Pa.1977) (finding acceptance when buyer was permitted unlimited inspection of a horse and then indicated that he would buy the horse), aff'd 568 F.2d 770 (3d Cir.1978).
cited Cited "see" United States v. James F. Magnus
7th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Buttram, 432 F.Supp. 1269 (W.D.Pa.1977), aff'd without opinion, 568 F.2d 770 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 995 , 98 S.Ct. 1646 , 56 L.Ed.2d 84 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Royal Business MacHines Inc. v. Lorraine Corp. And Michael L. Booher, Lorraine Corp. And Michael L. Booher v. Litton Business Systems, Inc. And Royal Business MacHines Inc., Defendants
7th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Official Comments 3 and 8 to U.C.C. § 2-313." Sessa v. Riegle, 427 F.Supp. 760, 766 (E.D.Pa.1977), aff'd without op. 568 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1978) Cf. Woodruff v. Clark County Farm Bureau Coop.
cited Cited "see" Royal Business Machines, Inc. v. Lorraine Corp.
7th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Official Comments 3 and 8 to U.C.C. § 2-313.” Sessa v. Riegle, 427 F.Supp. 760, 766 (E.D.Pa.1977), aff'd without op. 568 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1978).
discussed Cited "see" Indust-Ri-Chem Laboratory, Inc. v. Par-Pak Co. (2×)
Tex. App. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
Summers, supra. Agricultural Services Assoc., Inc. v. Ferry-Morse Seed Co., 551 F.2d 1057, 1064 (6th Cir.1977); see Sessa v. Riegle, 427 F.Supp. 760, 766 (E.D.Penn.1977), aff’d without opinion 568 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Employer Teamsters-Local Nos. 175/505 Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
S.D.W. Va · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
Richard A. Lord, 18 Williston on Contracts § 52:76 (4th ed. 2012) (footnotes omitted) (“As a general principle ... the implied warranty of merchantability requires only that the goods be fit for their ordinary purpose, not that they be perfect or in perfect condition, or be outstanding or superior, or of the best or highest quality.”); see also Sessa v. Riegle, 427 F.Supp. 760, 769 (E.D.Pa.1977), aff'd, 568 F.2d 770 (3d Cir.1978) (“The standard established [by U.C.C. § 2-314] does not require that goods be outstanding or superior.”); Miller v. Badgley, 51 Wash.App. 285 , 753 P.2d 530…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology
E.D. Pa. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
The warranty of merchantability does not require that the goods be “outstanding or superior.” They need only be “of reasonable quality within expected variations and for the ordinary purposes for which they are used.” Anderson, 3 Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-314:29 at 136; see also Sessa v. Riegle, 427 F.Supp. 760, 769 (E.D.Pa.1977), affirmed without opinion, 568 F.2d 770 (3d Cir.1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pollack
v.
United States
76-2540.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jan 19, 1978.
568 F.2d 770
Published

568 F.2d 770

Pollack
v.
U. S.

No. 76-2540

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

1/19/78

1

D.N.J.

VACATED AND REMANDED