green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
James v. United States
See Lucas v. United States, 443 F.Supp. 539 , 543 n. 2 (D.D.C.1977), aff’d, 590 F.2d 356 (D.C.Cir.1979). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Glendora v. Pinkerton Security & Detective Services
See, e.g., Lucas v. United States, 443 F.Supp. 539, 543-44 (D.D.C.1977), aff'd mem., 590 F.2d 356 (D.C.Cir.1979). *451 The FTCA also provides that “[t]he Attorney General shall defend any civil action or proceeding brought in any court against any employee of the Government or his estate for any damage or injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 2679 (c).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stevens v. Stover
“The focal point of the action is the question whether the arresting officer was justified in ordering the arrest of the plaintiff; if so, the conduct of the arresting officer is privileged and the action fails.” Dellums v. Powell, 566 F.2d 167, 175 (D.C.Cir.1977); see also Lucas v. United States, 443 F.Supp. 539, 543 (D.D.C.1977) (holding that “[u]nder the common law of the District of Columbia, probable cause to effect an arrest is a defense to a law enforcement officer for the tort[ ] of ... false arrest”), aff'd, 590 F.2d 356 (D.C.Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilcox v. United States
See also, Lucas v. United States, 443 F.Supp. 539 (D.D.C.1977) aff’d without opinion, 590 F.2d 356 (D.C.Cir.1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Woo
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
20-7035.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jan 15, 1979.
590 F.2d 356
Published
Woo
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
No. 77-1988
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
1/15/79
1
S.E.C.
AFFIRMED