green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Nosworthy
See United States v. Oates, 445 F.Supp. 351, 353 (E.D.N.Y. 1978), aff’d without op., 591 F.2d 1332 (2d Cir.1978). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert E. Smith (98-5888) Kathy Burch (98-5894) Raymond Burch (98-5895) Danny Eakles (98-5898) Deborah Eakles (98-5939)
See United States v. Drucker, 453 F.Supp. 741, 742 (S.D.N.Y.1978), aff'd 591 F.2d 1332 (2nd Cir.1978) (finding that whether or not the original indictment was defective, the indictment served to toll the statute of limitations under the Grady rule).
discussed
Cited "see"
Community Nutrition Institute v. Frank Young, Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration
See United States v. General Foods Corp., 446 F.Supp. 740, 745 (N.D.N.Y.) (also noting that “Congress has apparently mandated that the F.D.A. establish tolerances for poi *361 sonous or deleterious substances which are required or unavoidable in the production of food, such regulations relating to adulteration under [ 21 U.S.C. § 342 (a)(2)], see 21 U.S.C. § 346” but that there was no such requirement under the subsection at issue in that case), aff'd, 591 F.2d 1332 (2d Cir.1978); Certified Color Industry Committee v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 236 F.2d 866 (2d Cir.1956)…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Epstein
v.
Epstein
78-1257.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Nov 1, 1978.
591 F.2d 1332
Published
U. S.
v.
Epstein
No. 78-1257
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
11/1/78
1
S.D.N.Y.
2
AFFIRMED[*]
*
Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opinion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0.23