discussed Cited "see" United States v. Robert Hickman See generally 15B Charles A. Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure Sec. 3918.5, at 503-04 & n. 30 (1992) (citing United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1117-19 , reh'g denied, 598 F.2d 620 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 (1979), for the proposition that "in complex cases the initial double jeopardy ruling by the district court, and its affirmance by the court of appeals [on an interlocutory Abney appeal], do not preclude renewal of the double jeopardy question if the evidence developed at trial shows that in fact there was prior jeopardy"); see also United States v. Caporale…