green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
13.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases, 2006–2018 · 2 courts ·
…under any professional standard, it is improper for counsel to blindly rely on the statement of a criminal client whose reasoning abilities are highly suspect.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Joseph A. Brown v. United States
(2×)
under any professional standard, it is improper for counsel to blindly rely on the statement of a criminal client whose reasoning abilities are highly suspect.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lundgren v. Mitchell
under any professional standard, it is improper for counsel to blindly rely on the statement of a criminal client whose reasoning abilities are highly suspect.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jeffrey D. Lundgren v. Betty Mitchell, Warden
(2×)
See Brennan v. Blankenship, 472 F.Supp. 149, 156 (D.Va.1979), aff'd, 624 F.2d 1093 (4th Cir.1980) (“Under any professional standard, it is improper for counsel to blindly rely on the statement of a criminal client whose reasoning abilities are highly suspect.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alvord v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
(2×)
See Brennan v. Blankenship, 472 F.Supp. 149 (WD Va.1979), aff'd, 624 F.2d 1093 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Graham
v.
Johnson
v.
Johnson
80-6207.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jun 12, 1980.
624 F.2d 1093
Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia Court of … (2) · Sixth Circuit (1)
Graham
v.
Johnson
80-6207
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fourth Circuit
6/12/80
1
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED