Cargill, Inc. v. Powell, 625 F.2d 330 (9th Cir. 1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Cargill, Inc. v. Powell, 625 F.2d 330 (9th Cir. 1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“where a dispute involves trust or restricted property, the state may not adjudicate the dispute nor may its laws apply.”
15 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Owens Valley Indian Housing Authority v. Gifford Turner (ca9, 1999-08-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Owens Valley Indian Housing Authority v. Gifford Turner
9th Cir. · 1999 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
where a dispute involves trust or restricted property, the state may not adjudicate the dispute nor may its laws apply.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cargill, Inc. And State Accident Insurance Fund
v.
Kenneth Powell and Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
75-2655.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Feb 7, 1980.
625 F.2d 330
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)

625 F.2d 330

CARGILL, INC. and State Accident Insurance Fund, Petitioners,
v.
Kenneth POWELL and Director, Office of Workers Compensation
Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents.

No. 75-2655.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 7, 1980.

Before: LUMBARD, WRIGHT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

ON REMAND from the United States Supreme Court, 444 U.S. 987, 100 S.Ct. 516, 62 L.Ed.2d 417, vacating the judgment in Cargill, Inc. v. Powell, 573 F.2d 561 (9th Cir. 1979), for consideration in light of P. C. Pfeiffer Co. v. Ford, 444 U.S. 69, 100 S.Ct. 328, 62 L.Ed.2d 225 (1979).

2

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ordered by this court that the opinion in Cargill, Inc. v. Powell, No. 75-2655, filed on November 17, 1977, be withdrawn.

3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Benefits Review Board is affirmed and the petition for review is denied.