green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph v. Owens & Minor Distribution, Inc.
See Ames v. Cartier, Inc., 193 F.Supp.2d 762, 769 (S.D.N.Y.2002) (“While pandering to customers’ discriminatory preferences could very well help effectuate a sale, employers nevertheless ‘may not discriminate on the basis of their customers’ preferences.’ ” (citing Wigginess Inc. v. Fruchtman, 482 F.Supp. 681, 692 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd, 628 F.2d 1346 (2d Cir.1980))); Feder v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 33 F.Supp.2d 319, 333 (S.D.N.Y.1999) (finding that employer “cannot justify otherwise unlawful discrimination on the ground that one’s customers do not like to deal with members o…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gora v. City of Ferndale
See also Const. 1963, art. 1, §§ 11, 17. [4] 456 Mich. 851 , 568 N.W.2d 88 (1997). [5] 210 Mich.App. 622 , 533 N.W.2d 840 (1995). [6] 451 Mich. 875 , 549 N.W.2d 567 (1996). [7] Plaintiffs have not appealed from this portion of the Court of Appeals decision. [8] Accord Song v. Elyria, Ohio, 985 F.2d 840, 843 (C.A.6, 1993), Oriental Health Spa v. Fort Wayne, 864 F.2d 486, 490 (C.A.7, 1988), Mini Spas v. South Salt Lake City, 810 F.2d 939 (C.A.10, 1987), Pollard v. Cockrell, 578 F.2d 1002, 1010-1011 (C.A.5, 1978), Tomlinson v. Savannah, 543 F.2d 570, 571 (C.A.5, 1976), Colorado Springs Amusemen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Association Of Community Organizations For Reform Now v. Municipality Of Golden
Whether the city council or the police exercise this power, we believe that it runs afoul of the basic principle that "forbids the government from regulating speech in ways that favor some viewpoints or ideas at the expense of others." Taxpayers for Vincent, supra, --- U.S. at ---- - ----, 104 S.Ct. at 2128; see also Troyer v. Town of Babylon, 483 F.Supp. 1135, 1139 (E.D.N.Y.1980) (government has no power to restrict communication because of its content, subject matter or familiarity), aff'd mem., 628 F.2d 1346 (2d Cir.), summarily aff'd, 449 U.S. 988 , 101 S.Ct. 522 , 66 L.Ed.2d 285 (1980). 2…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now v. Municipality of Golden, Colorado
Whether the city council or the police exercise this power, we believe that it runs afoul of the basic principle that “forbids the government from regulating speech in ways that favor some viewpoints or ideas at the expense of others.” Taxpayers for Vincent, supra, — U.S. at---, 104 S.Ct. at 2128; see also Troyer v. Town of Babylon, 483 F.Supp. 1135, 1139 (E.D.N.Y.1980) (government has no power to restrict communication because of its content, subject matter or familiarity), aff'd mem., 628 F.2d 1346 (2d Cir.), summarily aff'd, 449 U.S. 988 , 101 S.Ct. 522 , 66 L.Ed.2d 285 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Komar
v.
Komar
79-6249.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Apr 3, 1980.
Published
U. S.
v.
Komar
79-6249, 79-6255
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit
4/3/80
S.D.N.Y., 473 F.Supp. 214
1
AFFIRMED[*]
*
Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opinion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0.23