green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mauriber v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.
See Todd v. Oppenheimer & Co., 78 F.R.D. 415, 420-21 (S.D.N.Y.1978); Gross v. Diversified Mortgage Investors, 431 F.Supp. 1080, 1087 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d mem., 636 F.2d 1201, 1203, 1206 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,777, 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 781 Chemetron Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Business Funds, Inc., Cross-Appellees
While Rules 8 and 9 must be read in conjunction, see Powell, Inc. v. Abney, 83 F.R.D. 482, 487 (S.D.Tex.1979), Rule 9(b) still requires that defendants be fairly apprised of the claims against them, including the “consequence[s] of the fraud,” Gross v. Diversified Mortgage Investors, 431 F.Supp. 1080, 1088 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d mem., 636 F.2d 1201, 1203, 1206 (2d Cir. 1980), and particularly of “the purchase or sale transactions . . . effectuated by reason of the misrepresentations,” Rich v. Touche Ross & Co., 68 F.R.D. 243, 247 (S.D.N.Y.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
FMC Corp. v. Boesky
See Gross v. Diversified Mortgage Investors, 431 F.Supp. 1080, 1083 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff'd without opinion, 636 F.2d 1201 (2d Cir.1980) (trust beneficiary on whose behalf shares were purchased has standing as a purchaser); Franklin Life Insurance Co. v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 451 F.Supp. 602, 608 (S.D.Ill.1978), aff'd, 598 F.2d 1109 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 900 , 100 S.Ct. 210 , 62 L.Ed.2d 136 (1979) (the plaintiff corporation was a purchaser when it bought preferred stock of the defendant corporation in connection with an underwriting offer and subsequent redemption for cash). 17 .
cited
Cited "see"
Frank E. Basil, Inc. v. Leidesdorf
See Gross v. Diversified Mortgage Investors, 431 F.Supp. 1080, 1087 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff'd 636 F.2d 1201 (2d Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Herman Friedlander, Etc., Cross-Appellees v. Jerry C. Nims, Timex Corporation, Cross-Appellant
See Gross v. Diversified Mortgage Investors, 431 F.Supp. 1080 (S.D.N.Y. 1977), aff’d, 636 F.2d 1201 (2d Cir.), aff’d, 636 F.2d 1203 (2d Cir.), aff’d, 636 F.2d 1206 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
McKee v. Pope Ballard Shepard & Fowle, Ltd.
See Gross v. Diversified Mortgage Investors, 431 F.Supp. 1080, 1087 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff'd, 636 F.2d 1201 , 1203, 1206 (2 Cir.1980); Baselski v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., 514 F.Supp. 535, 540 (N.D.Ill.1981) (Rule 9(b) should allow framing of responsive pleading and evidence “a reasonable belief on the part of the plaintiff that there is merit to the claim”).
cited
Cited "see"
Somerville v. Major Exploration, Inc.
See Gross v. Diversified Mortgage Investors, 431 F.Supp. 1080, 1088 (S.D.N.Y.1977) (Gagliardi, J.), aff'd, 636 F.2d 1201 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,120 Fay M. Kline v. Emanuel L. Wolf, Jay N. Feldman, C. Ray Holloway, William v. Lurie, Carl Prager, Julio Proietto, Jack M. Sattinger and Price Waterhouse and Co., Paul Block v. Emanuel L. Wolf, Jay M. Feldman, C. Ray Holloway, William v. Lurie, Carl Prager, Julio Proietto, Jack M. Sattinger and Price Waterhouse and Co.
See Goldberg v. Taylor Wine Co., 27 Fed.R.Serv. 1298 , 1300-02 (E.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd, 636 F.2d 1201 (2d Cir.1980) (credibility of plaintiff); Norman v. Arcs Equities Corp., 72 F.R.D. 502, 506 (S.D.N.Y.1976) (plaintiff's failure to comply with discovery rules); see also Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 549-50 , 69 S.Ct. 1221, 1227 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949) (class representative is a fiduciary, and interests of the class are "dependent upon his diligence, wisdom and integrity"). 11 Plaintiffs next argue that the district court never resolved the issue of credibility, but sim…
discussed
Cited "see"
Kline v. Wolf
See Goldberg v. Taylor Wine Co., 27 Fed.R.Serv. 1298 , 1300-02 (E.D.N.Y.1979), aff’d, 636 F.2d 1201 (2d Cir.1980) (credibility of plaintiff); Norman v. Arcs Equities Corp., 72 F.R.D. 502, 506 (S.D.N.Y.1976) (plaintiff’s failure to comply with discovery rules); see also Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 549-50 , 69 S.Ct. 1221, 1227 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949) (class representative is a fiduciary, and interests of the class are “dependent upon his diligence, wisdom and integrity”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kaufman v. Magid
See, e.g., Gross v. Diversified Mortgage Investors, 431 F.Supp. 1080, 1087 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d without opinion, 636 F.2d 1201 (2nd Cir. 1980); Lerman v. ITB Management Corporation, 58 F.R.D. 153, 155-56 (D.Mass.1973) (“Lerman”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Flood
v.
Japan Line, Ltd
v.
Japan Line, Ltd
80-7115.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Oct 1, 1980.
Published
Flood
v.
Japan Line, Ltd.
80-7115
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit
10/1/80
E.D.N.Y., 487 F.Supp. 364
AFFIRMED