green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Cordero v. United States
(2×)
But see United States v. Furey, 491 F.Supp. 1048, 1054-55 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 636 F.2d 1211 (1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1987 , 68 L.Ed.2d 304 (1981); Commonwealth v. Harrison, 368 Mass. 366, 369-72 , 331 N.E.2d 873, 875-77 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mariani
See United States v. Cryan, 490 F.Supp. 1234 (D.N.J.), aff'd, 636 F.2d 1211 (3d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hall American Center Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Dick
See, e.g., United States v. Furey, 491 F.Supp. 1048, 1061 (E.D.Pa.) (extortion under Act general intent crime but noting defendant must have "general” intent to exploit the fear), aff’d without opinion, 636 F.2d 1211 (3rd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1987 , 68 L.Ed.2d 304 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Recognition Equipment, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Cryan, 490 F.Supp. 1234 , (D.N.J.), aff'd, 636 F.2d 1211 (3d Cir.1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wallace
v.
Bosta
v.
Bosta
79-1844.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Dec 22, 1980.
636 F.2d 1211
Published
Wallace
v.
Bosta
79-1844
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit
12/22/80
1
E.D.Pa.
AFFIRMED