Bernard B. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Of Greater New York, 679 F.2d 7 (2d Cir. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Bernard B. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Of Greater New York, 679 F.2d 7 (2d Cir. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. University Hospital, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Parents of Baby Jane Doe, Intervenors-Defendants-Appellees (ca2, 1984-02-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. University Hospital, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Parents of Baby Jane Doe, Intervenors-Defendants-Appellees (2×)
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bernard B. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Greater New York, 528 F.Supp. 125, 132 (S.D.N.Y.1981), aff'd, 679 F.2d 7 (2d Cir.1982) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Dorer v. Quest Diagnostics Inc.
D. Maryland · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Bernard B., et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Greater New York, 528 F.Supp. 125 (S.D.N.Y.1981), aff'd 679 F.2d 7 (2d Cir.1982) (health insurer is subject to Act).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant-Appellant
5th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
February 12, 1979) (same); Bob Jones University v. Johnson, 396 F.Supp. 597 , 603 n. 21 (D.S.C.1974), aff'd without opinion, 529 F.2d 514 (4th Cir.1975) (district court finds Medicare and Medicaid to be federal financial assistance for Title VI purposes); see also Bernard B. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield, 528 F.Supp. 125, 132 (SDNY 1981), aff'd without opinion, 679 F.2d 7 (2d Cir.1982) (district court assumes that Medicare constitutes “federal financial assistance” in holding that if Medicare linked to discriminatory program plaintiffs may state a Section 504 case); Flora v. Moore, 461 F.S…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bernard B. And Shirley B., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
v.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Greater New York Albert Lewis, Individually and as Superintendent of the New York Insurance Department New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
908.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
May 18, 1982.
679 F.2d 7
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

679 F.2d 7

BERNARD B. and Shirley B., individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, Appellants,
v.
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF GREATER NEW YORK; Albert
Lewis, individually and as Superintendent of the
New York Insurance Department; New York
City Health and Hospitals
Corporation, Appellees.

No. 908, Docket 81-7791.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued March 24, 1982.
Decided May 18, 1982.

Minna J. Kotkin, New York Lawyers for the Public Interest, Inc., New York City, for appellants.

Robert A. Bicks, Breed, Abbott & Morgan, New York City (Victoria A. Cundiff, Rosemary A. Moukad and John L. Shurtleff, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Greater New York, New York City, of counsel), for appellee Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Greater New York.

June A. Witterschein, New York City (Frederick A. O. Schwartz, Jr., Corp. Counsel, Stephen J. McGrath, New York City, of counsel), for appellee New York City Health and Hospitals Corp.

Donald Sticklor, Asst. Atty. Gen., New York City (Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen. of the State of New York, George D. Zuckerman, Asst. Sol. Gen., New York City, of counsel), for appellee Lewis.

Before LUMBARD and OAKES, Circuit Judges, and FRIEDMAN, Chief Judge, United States Court of Claims.[*]

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District Court of New York is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Sand below, 528 F.Supp. 125 (S.D.N.Y.1981).

*

Sitting by designation