green
Positive treatment
12.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
James M. Root & Valerie K. Root
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
The Ninth Circuit affirmed our decision “[e]ssentially upon the basis of the Tax Court’s opinion.” Todd v. Commissioner, 682 F.2d at 208.
cited
Cited "see"
Lender Management, LLC, Marvin K. Lender Revocable Trust, Tax Matters Partner v. Commissioner
See Todd v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 246, 248 (1981), aff’d, 682 F.2d 207 (9th Cir. 1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnsen v. Commissioner
(2×)
See Todd v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 246 (1981), affd. per curiam 682 F.2d 207 (9th Cir. 1982); Birdneck Realty Corp. v. Commissioner, 25 B.T.A. 1084 (1932); Harrisburg Hospital Inc. v. Commissioner, 15 B.T.A. 1014 (1929).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hovis v. Commissioner
See, e.g., Todd v. Commissioner , 77 T.C. 246 (1981) (loss sustained on the abandonment of a real estate venture was not attributable to a trade or business where the taxpayer neither commenced operations nor was previously involved in similar ventures), and the cases cited therein at 249-250, affd. per curiam 682 F.2d 207 (9th Cir. 1982) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waddell v. Commissioner
(2×)
See also Todd v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 246, 249-250 (1981), affd. per curiam 682 F.2d 207 (9th Cir. 1982). 25 We have held, however, that the preopening expense doctrine does not apply to amounts deductible under section 212(2), paid or incurred for the management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for the production of income.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Malcolm C. Todd and Ruth S. Todd
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
81-7757.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jul 19, 1982.
Published
82-2 USTC P 9501
Malcolm C. TODD and Ruth S. Todd, Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee.
No. 81-7757.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted July 7, 1982.
Decided July 19, 1982.
On Appeal from the Decision of the United States Tax Court.
Brian J. Seery, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.
Michael L. Paup, Ann Belanger Durney, Jay Miller, Frank P. Cihlar, Justice Dept., Tax Div., Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before ELY, GOODWIN, and NELSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Essentially upon the basis of the Tax Court's OPINION, reported at 77 T.C. 246 (1981), the decision of the Tax Court is
2
AFFIRMED.