In Re Woodruff (Richard E.)woodruff, in Re, 727 F.2d 1119 (Fed. Cir. 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Woodruff (Richard E.)woodruff, in Re, 727 F.2d 1119 (Fed. Cir. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
50 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nicastro v. Clinton (dcd, 1995-04-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nicastro v. Clinton
D.D.C. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Emory v. United States, 2 CLCt. 579, 580 (1983), aff'd, 727 F.2d 1119 (Fed.Cir.1983); Vanskike v. Peters, 974 F.2d at 810 . 3 The District of Columbia Circuit has recognized that the traditional economic reality test fails “ ‘to capture the true nature of [most prison employment] relationship[s] for essentially [it] presuppose[s] a free labor situation.’ ” Henthom v. Department of Navy, 29 F.3d at 686 (quoting Vanskike v. Peters, 974 F.2d at 809 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re Woodruff (Richard E.)woodruff, in Re
83-1026.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Dec 7, 1983.
727 F.2d 1119
Published

727 F.2d 1119

In re Woodruff (Richard E.)Woodruff, In re

NO. 83-1026

United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.

DEC 07, 1983

Appeal From: TO

PTO.