green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Ronald Pooler v. United States of America. Ronnie Bradley v. United States
But cf. Amato v. United States, 549 F.Supp. 863 (D.NJ.1982), aff'd mem., 729 F.2d 1445 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oden v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.
(2×)
See Amato v. United States, 549 F.Supp. 863, 867 (D.N.J.1982), aff'd without opinion, 729 F.2d 1445 (3d Cir.1984) (bank robber, severely injured by gunfire during a bank robbery, could not recover from FBI on theory that it had acted negligently when, with prior notice of his plan to rob the bank, it failed to apprehend him for the lesser crime of conspiracy); Lord v. Fogcutter Bar, 813 P.2d 660, 662 (Alaska 1991) (intoxicated man who left a bar with a woman and was later convicted of raping her could not recover from bar and bartender on theory that the bartender was criminally negligent in c…
discussed
Cited "see"
Brack v. Allstate Insurance
See Allstate Insurance Co. v. Sentry Insurance, 563 F.Supp. 629 (E.D.Pa.1983), aff 'd, 729 F.2d 1445 (3d Cir.1984) (citing Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co. v. Goodville Mutual Casualty Co., 403 Pa. 603 , 170 A.2d 571 (1961)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Neal v. Altoona Hospital
See Boreson v. Rohm & Haas, Inc., 526 F. Supp. 1230 , 1232-33 n.4 (E.D., Pa. 1981) aff'd mem., 729 F.2d 1445 (3d Cir. 1984) (Lord, C.J.); Harrison v. Fred S. James, Inc., 558 F. Supp. 438, 445 (E.D., Pa. 1983) (Bechtle, J.).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Riverside Nursing Home
See Beneficial Commercial Corporation v. Railserv Management Corporation, 563 F.Supp. 114 (E.D.Pa.1983) (assignment of rights in repurchase agreement establishes assignee, not assignor, as real party in interest), aff'd, 729 F.2d 1445 (3d Cir.1984) (mem.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Non-Punitive Segregation Inmates of Holmesburg Prison v. Kelly
A recent unpublished Third Circuit opinion 2 states: “At least in cases where the motion is labeled as a Rule 60(b) motion and where treating it as a Rule 59 motion would ‘destroy’ appelláte jurisdiction, we believe it should be treated as it is labeled.” In re Bankers Trust Co., 729 F.2d 1445 , slip op. at 3-4 (3d Cir.1984) (per curiam) (footnote omitted); see 729 F.2d 1445 (1984) (note of decision).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rimert v. Mortell
See, e.g., Amato v. United States (1982) D.N.J., 549 F.Supp. 868 , aff'd, (1984) 3d Cir., 729 F.2d 1445 (no recovery against FBI by bank robber who was injured by gunfire during robbery on theory that FBI was negligent when, despite prior notice of robber’s plan, FBI failed to arrest robber upon conspiracy charges prior to robbery); Oden v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. (1993) Ala., 621 So.2d 953 (no action for damages based on death of child who died when soft drink machine fell on him, since child was attempting to steal soft drinks from machine); Lord v. Fogcutter Bar (1991) Alaska, 813 P.2d 66…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Howarth v. State, Public Defender Agency
(2×)
Actions § 29 (1985); Snug Harbor Packing Co. v. Schmidt, 394 P.2d 397, 399 (Alaska 1964); see also Amato v. United States, 549 F.Supp. 863, 867 (D.N.J.1982), aff'd without opinion, 729 F.2d 1445 (3d Cir.1984) (suspect shot during armed robbery cannot sue police for negligence in failing to apprehend him prior to robbery); Cole v. Taylor, 301 N.W.2d 766, 768 (Iowa 1981) (plaintiff prohibited from recovering in tort from her psychiatrist on claim that he negligently failed to prevent her from committing murder).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lord v. Fogcutter Bar
Actions § 29 (1985); Snug Harbor Packing Co. v. Schmidt, 394 P.2d 397, 399 (Alaska 1964); see also Amato v. United States, 549 F.Supp. 863, 867 (D.N.J.1982), aff'd without opinion, 729 F.2d 1445 (3d Cir.1984) (suspect shot during armed robbery cannot sue police for negligence in failing to apprehend him prior to robbery); Cole v. Taylor, 301 N.W.2d 766, 768 (Iowa 1981) (plaintiff prohibited from recovering in tort from her psychiatrist on claim that he negligently failed to prevent her from committing murder).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Boresen (Richard O.)
v.
Rohm and Haas,inc
v.
Rohm and Haas,inc
83-1270.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Feb 7, 1984.
729 F.2d 1445
Published
Boresen (Richard O.)
v.
Rohm and Haas,Inc.
NO. 83-1270
United States Court of Appeals,
third Circuit.
FEB 07, 1984
1
Appeal From: E.D.Pa.,
2
AFFIRMED.