green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Koonce v. Quaker Safety Products & Manufacturing Co.
The affirmance- was entirely without opinion under our local rule 47.6. 731 F.2d at 886.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
21 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 631, prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,207 Rita Koonce v. Quaker Safety Products & Manufacturing Company, and Delaware Valley Safeguards Company, Inc.
The affirmance was entirely without opinion under our local rule 47.6. 731 F.2d at 886. 8 In the present case, plaintiffs' claims are based on injuries that resulted in death; thus, plaintiffs' actions must have been commenced within two years of the death of the injured party. 7 Koonce died from his severe burns on December 18, 1979.
discussed
Cited "see"
Warminster Township Municipal Authority v. United States
Reeves v. United States, 809 F.Supp. 92, 94 (N.D.Ga.1992), aff'd without op., 996 F.2d 1232 (11th Cir.1993); see Swift v. United States Border Patrol, 578 F.Supp. 35, 37 (S.D.Tex.1983) (“[I]t is incumbent upon the Plaintiff to state in his complaint the grounds upon which the sovereign consented to [the] suit.”), aff'd without op., 731 F.2d 886 (5th Cir.1984); 5 Charles A. Wright & Arthur R.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Swift
v.
U.S. Border Patrol
v.
U.S. Border Patrol
83-2484.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 4, 1984.
Published
Swift
v.
U.S. Border Patrol[*]
NO. 83-2484
United States Court of Appeals,
fifth Circuit.
APR 04, 1984
Appeal From: S.D.Tex.,578 F.Supp. 35
1
AFFIRMED.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2