Armand v. Mullens, 760 F.2d 279 (11th Cir. 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Armand v. Mullens, 760 F.2d 279 (11th Cir. 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Carl M. Limbaugh v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., a Corporation (ca11, 1986-03-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Carl M. Limbaugh v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., a Corporation
11th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Morrison Assurance Co. v. North American Reinsurance Corp., 588 F.Supp. 1324, 1328 (N.D.Ala.1984), aff'd, 760 F.2d 279 (11th Cir.1985) (”[w]hile nominal damage can support an award of punitive damages, there must be some damage”). 6 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Armand
v.
Mullens
84-3692.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Apr 8, 1985.
760 F.2d 279
Published

760 F.2d 279

*Armand
v.
Mullens

84-3692

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

4/8/85

1

M.D.Fla.

AFFIRMED

2

---------------

* Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 23.