green
Positive treatment
1.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re the Complaint of Ingram Barge Co.
See Hillier, 714 F.2d at 722-23 (“to interpret the Suits in Admiralty Act as a waiver of the government’s sovereign immunity ... in a suit based on a radically new theory of liability ... would violate the principle that the United States’ consent to be sued is not lightly inferred”) (quoting Mitchell, 463 U.S. at 218 , 103 S.Ct. 2961 ); see also Cesaroni v. United States, 624 F.Supp. 613, 619 (S.D.Ga.), aff'd, 780 F.2d 1031 (11th Cir.1985) (noting that, under either the Tucker Act or the SAA, “the contract that plaintiff is relying upon must be recognized specifically as a contract …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Southeastern Fire Ins.
v.
Heard
v.
Heard
85-8547.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Dec 17, 1985.
780 F.2d 1031
Published
**Southeastern Fire Ins.
v.
Heard
85-8547
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
12/17/85
1
N.D.Ga.
AFFIRMED
2
---------------
** Local Rule: 25 case.