green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
General Star Indemnity Co. v. Virgin Islands Port Authority
Id. at 1051; 22 V.I.C. § 846 (2004). 1 Furthermore, courts “should read policy provisions to avoid ambiguities, if possible, and not torture the language to create them.” Northbrook Ins.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re Consumers Power Co. Derivative Litigation
Even in the much cited case of Allison on behalf of General Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 604 F.Supp. 1106, 1119 (DC Del 1985), aff'd without op., 782 F.2d 1026 (3rd Cir.1985), that decided a Rule 23.1 motion to dismiss "solely on the face of the complaint as amended to reflect wrongful rejection of the demand," limited discovery was permitted "relevant to the motion to dismiss." Id. at 1110.
discussed
Cited "see"
Biase v. Kaplan
“When making a determination under Rule 12(b)(6), the court cannot consider matters outside the pleadings.” 13 Wiley v. Hughes *285 Capital Corp., 746 F.Supp. 1264, 1275 (D.N.J. 1990); see Allison v. General Motors Corp., 604 F.Supp. 1106, 1119 (D.Del.), aff'd, 782 F.2d 1026 (3d Cir.1985). a.
cited
Cited "see"
Waltuch v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.
Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado, 430 A.2d 779 , 784 n. 10 (Del.1981); Accord Allison v. General Motors Corp., 604 F.Supp. 1106, 1120 (D.Del.), aff'd mem., 782 F.2d 1026 (3d Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Citron v. Daniell
See Allison v. General Motors Corp., 604 F.Supp. 1106, 1113 (D.Del.), aff'd without opinion, 782 F.2d 1026 (3d Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Grafman v. Century Broadcasting Corp.
See the excellent discussion of this topic in Allison on behalf of G.M.C. v. General Motors Corp., 604 F.Supp. 1106, 1115-16 (D.Del.1985), aff’d, 782 F.2d 1026 (3rd Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rubin v. Posner
(2×)
See Allison v. General Motors Corp., 604 F.Supp. 1106, 1112 (D.Del.), aff'd, 782 F.2d 1026 (3d Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Hilton
See Allison on Behalf of General Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 604 F.Supp. 1106, 1122 (D.Del.), aff'd mem., 782 F.2d 1026 (3d Cir.1985) (district court faced with a “demand refused” case followed the particularity standard regarding the plaintiff-shareholder’s allegations that the board’s decision was tainted by self-interest, bad faith or fraud).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re E.F. Hutton Banking Practices Litigation
See Allison v. General Motors Corp. (D.Del.1985) 604 F.Supp. 1106 , aff'd (3d Cir.1985) 782 F.2d 1026 (shareholder made a demand, board formed a special litigation committee to investigate the allegations and two and a half months later shareholder brought suit, alleging futility.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
DeRay v. Larson
See also Bey v. Williams, 590 F.Supp. 1150, 1155 (W.D.Pa.1984), aff'd, 782 F.2d 1026 (3d Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.
See also Allison v. General Motors Corp., 604 F.Supp. 1106 (D.Del.1985), aff'd, 782 F.2d 1026 (3d Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Litton Industries, Inc. by Wildflower Partnership v. Hoch
Id. at 784 ; see also Allison v. General Motors, Corp., 604 F.Supp. 1106, 1115 (D.Del.), aff'd mem., 782 F.2d 1026 (3d Cir.1985) (holding that RICO does not bar director termination of shareholder suits).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Felice v. Sever
See, e.g., Evangelista v. Inlandboatmen's Union, 777 F.2d 1390, 1400 (9th Cir.1985) (immunity extends to suits against union officers for breach of the duty of fair representation, if suit is brought in the context of a hybrid section 301/duty of fair representation claim); see also Bey v. Williams, 590 F.Supp. 1150, 1154-55 (W.D.Pa.1984) (same), aff'd without opinion, 782 F.2d 1026 (3d Cir.1986); see also Republic Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers, 570 F.2d 467 , 478 (3d Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Felice v. Sever
See, e.g., Evangelista v. Inlandboatmen's Union, 777 F.2d 1390, 1400 (9th Cir.1985) (immunity extends to suits against union officers for breach of the duty of fair representation, if suit is brought in the context of a hybrid section 301/duty of fair representation claim); see also Bey v. Williams, 590 F.Supp. 1150, 1154-55 (W.D.Pa.1984) (same), aff'd without opinion, 782 F.2d 1026 (3d Cir.1986); see also Republic Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers, 570 F.2d 467 , 478 (3d Cir.1978). 43 When Judge Cohill granted summary judgment on the state claims, he did so on the ground Felice was covered b…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re General Motors Class E Stock Buyout Securities Litigation
See also Allison v. General Motors Corp., 604 F.Supp. 1106, 1120 (D.Del.), aff'd mem. 782 F.2d 1026 (3d Cir.1985) (“Delaware state law controls whether the amended complaint sufficiently alleges that the GM Board wrongfully rejected plaintiff’s demand.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Levine v. Smith
Grobow I, 539 A.2d at 187 n. 6; see also Allison on Behalf of General Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 604 F.Supp. 1106, 1112 (D.Del.) (Rule 23.1 represents “a marked departure from the ‘notice’ pleading philosophy” governing the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), aff'd mem., 782 F.2d 1026 (3d Cir.1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Boone
v.
Philadelphia Gear Corp
v.
Philadelphia Gear Corp
85-1345.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jan 22, 1986.
782 F.2d 1026
Published
Boone
v.
Philadelphia Gear Corp.
85-1345
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
1/22/86
E.D.Pa.,
Hall, J.
AFFIRMED