green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Banks v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
In one case, in which it was necessary to distinguish erosion caused by the government from naturally occurring erosion, see Baskett v. United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 201, 211-12 (1985), aff'd, 790 F.2d 93 (Fed.Cir.1986) (table), the court rejected the plaintiffs' argument that erosion caused by the government did not sufficiently manifest itself within seven years of the government’s actions for the situation to stabilize, id. at 231. .
discussed
Cited "see"
Edith Rios v. Department of Justice
ID at 23; see Renville v. Department of Health and Human Services, 21 M.S.P.R. 737 , 739-40 (1984) (finding that the appellant’s retirement was not coerced because his reasons for retiring in lieu of being reassigned were personal and not attributable to any agency action) , aff’d, 790 F.2d 93 (Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Hartle v. United States
See C & L Construction Co. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 791, 797 (1984), aff'd, 790 F.2d 93 (Fed.Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Dufau v. United States
See C & L Construction Co. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 791, 799 (1984), aff'd, 790 F.2d 93 (Fed.Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Edwards v. United States
Accord, C &L Constr, Co. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 791, 799 (1984), affd, 790 F.2d 93 (Fed.Cir.1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Digicourse
v.
Ama Distributors
v.
Ama Distributors
85-2185.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Feb 26, 1986.
Published
#Digicourse
v.
AMA Distributors
85-2185
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
2/26/86
DCt/E.La., 629 F.Supp. 1310
Affirmed
1
---------------
# Denotes patent appeals.