Cibro Petroleum Prods., Inc. v. Sohio Alaska Petroleum Co., 798 F.2d 1421 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Cibro Petroleum Prods., Inc. v. Sohio Alaska Petroleum Co., 798 F.2d 1421 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kenston Management Co. v. Lisa Realty Co. (In Re Kenston Management Co.) (nyeb, 1992-03-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Kenston Management Co. v. Lisa Realty Co. (In Re Kenston Management Co.)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cibro Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Sohio Alaska Petroleum Co., 602 F.Supp. 1520, 1545 (N.D.N.Y.1985) (stating general contracts principle that if contract is unambiguous, extrinsic evidence should be excluded), aff'd per curiam, 798 F.2d 1421 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.), cert. dismissed, 479 U.S. 979 , 107 S.Ct. 562 , 93 L.Ed.2d 568 (1986); Schmidt v. Magnetic Head Corp., 97 A.D.2d 151, 157 , 468 N.Y.S.2d 649, 654 (2d Dep’t. 1983) (reference to extrinsic evidence not permitted even to determine whether ambiguity exists in contract).
discussed Cited "see" Sharma v. Skaarup Ship Management Corporation
2d Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cibro Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Sohio Alaska Petroleum Co., 602 F.Supp. 1520, 1545 (N.D.N.Y.1985) (stating general contracts principle that if contract is unambiguous, extrinsic evidence should be excluded), aff'd per curiam, 798 F.2d 1421 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.), cert. dismissed, 479 U.S. 979 , 107 S.Ct. 562 , 93 L.Ed.2d 568 (1986); Schmidt v. Magnetic Head Corp., 97 A.D.2d 151, 157 , 468 N.Y.S.2d 649, 654 (2d Dep't.1983) (reference to extrinsic evidence not permitted even to determine whether ambiguity exists in contract). 43 Finally, we reject as utterly frivolous the argument that the Se…
discussed Cited "see" Sharma v. Skaarup Ship Management Corp.
2d Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cibro Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Sohio Alaska Petroleum Co., 602 F.Supp. 1520, 1545 (N.D.N.Y.1985) (stating general contracts principle that if contract is unambiguous, extrinsic evidence should be excluded), aff'd per curiam, 798 F.2d 1421 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.), cert. dismissed, 479 U.S. 979 , 107 S.Ct. 562 , 93 L.Ed.2d 568 (1986); Schmidt v. Magnetic Head Corp., 97 A.D.2d 151, 157 , 468 N.Y.S.2d 649, 654 (2d Dep’t.1983) (reference to extrinsic evidence not permitted even to determine whether ambiguity exists in contract).
cited Cited "see" Marketing Specialists, Inc. v. Bruni
W.D.N.Y. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cibro-Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Sohio Alaska Petroleum, Co., 602 F.Supp. 1520, 1551-52 (N.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd, 798 F.2d 1421 (Temp.Em.Ct.App.1986) (adopting opinion below); Fed.R.Evid. 406.
discussed Cited "see" Singer Products Co. v. First American Bank of New York (In Re Singer Products Co.)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cibro Petroleum Products v. Sohio Alaska Petroleum, 602 F.Supp. 1520 , 1531 n. 12 (N.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd on other grounds, 798 F.2d 1421 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 979 , 107 S.Ct. 562 , 93 L.Ed.2d 568 (1986); Eskimo Pie Corp. v. Whitelawn Dairies, Inc., 284 F.Supp. 987 (S.D.N.Y.1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CIBRO PETROLEUM PRODUCTS, INC.
v.
SOHIO ALASKA PETROLEUM CO.
No. 2-47.
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals.
Jul 10, 1986.
798 F.2d 1421
Daniel Joseph, Warren E. Connelly, C. Fairly Spillman, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, Washington, D.C., Harry Neal Conolly, Hesson, Ford, Sherwood & Whalen, Albany, N.Y., for defendant/appellant Sohio Alaska Petroleum Co., William W. Scott, John B. Williams, Collier, Shannon, Rill & Scott, Washington, D.C., David F. Kunz, DeGraff, Foy, Conway, Holt-Harris & Mealey, Albany, N.Y., for plaintiff/appellee Cibro Petroleum Products, Inc.
Published
PER CURIAM:

The Court hereby affirms the judgment of the district court as reported at 602 F.Supp. 1520 (N.D.N.Y.1985). We adopt its well-reasoned opinion as our own.

The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.