discussed Cited "see, e.g." Snowhite Dust Control Services, Inc. v. Becker See also Gibbs v. Air Canada, 810 F.2d 1529 (11th Cir.1987), reh'g. denied, 816 F.2d 688 (11th Cir.1987). 1 A provision securing an indemnitee against its own negligence must be clear and unequivocal within the context of the agreement.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dahlem ex rel. Dahlem v. Board of Education of Denver Public Schools For the purpose of deciding whether a plaintiff is a prevailing party, a preliminary injunction is considered a decision on the merits so long as it “represent[s] an unambiguous indication of probable success on the merits, and not merely a maintenance of the status quo.... ” Webster v. Sowders, 846 F.2d 1032, 1036 (6th Cir.1988); see also, e.g., Taylor v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 810 F.2d 1551, 1558 (11th Cir.), reh’g en banc denied, 816 F.2d 688 (11th Cir.1987); Chu Drua Cha v. Levine, 701 F.2d 750, 751 (8th Cir.1983).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dahlem v. Denver Public Schools For the purpose of deciding whether a plaintiff is a prevailing party, a preliminary injunction is considered a decision on the merits so long as it "represent[s] an unambiguous indication of probable success on the merits, and not merely a maintenance of the status quo...." Webster v. Sowders, 846 F.2d 1032, 1036 (6th Cir.1988); see also, e.g., Taylor v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 810 F.2d 1551, 1558 (11th Cir.), reh'g en banc denied, 816 F.2d 688 (11th Cir.1987); Chu Drua Cha v. Levine, 701 F.2d 750, 751 (8th Cir.1983).