green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Angarita v. St. Louis County
See Messick v. Leavins, 811 F.2d 1439 (11th Cir.1987) reh. den, en banc, 817 F.2d 761 (11th Cir.1987) (superintendent of public works had final policymaking authority, thereby binding city) and Pembaur, 475 U.S. at 481-83 , 106 S.Ct. at 1299-1300 , (a municipality is liable under Section 1983 for actions directed by an official who establishes governmental policy whether that action is taken only once or repeatedly). 58 Kleinknecht had final policymaking authority in the St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Angarita v. St. Louis County
See Messick v. Leavins, 811 F.2d 1439 (11th Cir.1987) reh. den, en banc, 817 F.2d 761 (11th Cir.1987) (superintendent of public works had final policymaking authority, thereby binding city) and Pembaur, 475 U.S. at 481-83 , 106 S.Ct. at 1299-1300 , (a municipality is liable under Section 1983 for actions directed by an official who establishes governmental policy whether that action is taken only once or repeatedly).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. Beaufort County, North Carolina
See Allen v. Alabama State Bd. of Educ., 612 F.Supp. 1046, 1051 (M.D.Ala.1985), vacated on other grounds, 636 F.Supp. 64 (M.D.Ala.1986), reversed, 816 F.2d 575 , reh'g denied, 817 F.2d 761 (11th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. Beaufort County
See Allen v. Alabama State Bd. of Educ., 612 F.Supp. 1046, 1051 (M.D.Ala.1985), vacated on other grounds, 636 F.Supp. 64 (M.D.Ala.1986), reversed, 816 F.2d 575 , reh’g denied, 817 F.2d 761 (11th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Pataki
Id. at **3-5 ; see also Allen v. Ala. State Bd. of Educ., 816 F.2d 575 (11th Cir.1987) (holding that court-approved settlement was binding on Board of Education when latter, in response to public criticism, voted to disapprove the settlement), reh’g denied, 817 F.2d 761 (11th Cir.1987); Moore v. Beaufort County, 936 F.2d 159 (4th Cir. 1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brickwood Contractors, Inc. v. United States
See, e.g., Ritter v. Smith, 811 F.2d 1398, 1401 (11th Cir.) (“The Eleventh Circuit has recognized that Rule 60(b) can be used to remedy a mistake in the application of the law.... [Sjometimes more than a ‘mere’ change in the law is necessary to provide the grounds for Rule 60(b)(6) relief____A significant factor in this case is the fact that the previous erroneous, judgment of this court has not been executed.”), reh’g denied, 817 F.2d 761 (11th Cir.), and cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1010 , 107 S.Ct. 3242 , 97 L.Ed.2d 747 (1987); D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McGullion
v.
Jones
v.
Jones
86-7596.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Apr 20, 1987.
817 F.2d 761
Published
McGullion
v.
Jones
86-7596
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
4/20/87
N.D.Ala., 813 F.2d 409