William Walker, Jr. v. Riggs Motors, Inc., 831 F.2d 298 (6th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
William Walker, Jr. v. Riggs Motors, Inc., 831 F.2d 298 (6th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
96 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 37 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hirschhorn v. Sizzler Restaurants International, Inc. (nvd, 1995-12-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hirschhorn v. Sizzler Restaurants International, Inc.
D. Nev. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wimbley v. Bolger, 642 F.Supp. 481, 484 (W.D.Tenn.1986), aff'd, 831 F.2d 298 (6th Cir.1987) (court upheld Plaintiffs termination based on unexcused absenteeism because reasonable accommodation does not compel employer to excuse employee’s failure to report to work); Carr v. Reno, 23 F.3d 525 (D.C.Cir.1994) (holding that “coming to work regularly” is an “essential function”).
discussed Cited "see" Lawrence v. Metro-Dade Police Department
S.D. Fla. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wimbley v. Bolger, 642 F.Supp. 481, 485 (W.D.Tenn.1986), aff'd 831 F.2d 298 (6th Cir.1987) (fact that employee considered 30 percent disabled does not automatically render him handicapped for the purposes of the Rehabilitation Act).
discussed Cited "see" MacKie v. Runyon
M.D. Fla. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wimbley v. Bolger, 642 F.Supp. 481, 486 (W.D.Tenn.1986) (noting that a federal agency is not obligated to transfer a handicapped employee from the job for which he is employed to some other position to accommodate his handicap), aff'd mem., 831 F.2d 298 (6th Cir.1987); Carty v. Carlin, 623 F.Supp. 1181, 1188-89 (D.Md.1985) (finding that the phrase “posi tion in question” in 29 C.F.R. § 1613.702 (f) refers to a plaintiff’s present position and that 29 C.F.R. § 1613.704 (b) requires only reasonable workplace modifications to allow the plaintiff to stay in the plaintiff’s present po…
discussed Cited "see" O'Dell v. Jennmar Corp. of West Virginia, Inc.
W. Va. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wimbley v. Bolger, 642 F.Supp. 481 (W.D.Tenn.1986), aff'd, 831 F.2d 298 (6th Cir.1987) (fact that employee had 30% service-connected disability under Veteran Administration standards does not automatically render individual “handicapped employee”).
cited Cited "see" James Charles Wood v. United States
6th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wood v. United States, 831 F.2d 298 (6th Cir. October 15, 1987) (unpublished), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1077 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" In re Whittenburg
S.D. Ohio · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 831 F.2d 298 (6th Cir.1987) (LEXIS, Genfed library, Dist. file) (“We agree with other circuit courts which have considered this issue and found that statute [ 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1)(B)] constitutional.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Howard v. Magoffin County Board of Education
E.D. Ky. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Inc., 31 F.3d 209, 213 (4th Cir.1994)); see also Wimbley v. Bolger, 642 F.Supp. 481, 485 (W.D.Tenn.1986) (“It is elemental that one who does not come to work cannot perform any of his job functions, essential or otherwise”), aff 'd, 831 F.2d 298 , at *1 (6th Cir.1987) (unpublished table decision).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Walker, Jr.
v.
Riggs Motors, Inc.
87-5357.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Oct 7, 1987.
831 F.2d 298
Unpublished

831 F.2d 298

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
William WALKER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RIGGS MOTORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 87-5357

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

October 7, 1987.

ORDER

Before NATHANIEL R. JONES and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

1

This matter is before the court upon consideration of plaintiff's appeal from the district court's order denying his motion for relief under Rule 60(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. Plaintiff filed the motion in district court for relief from its order dismissing his civil rights complaint and restraining him from filing further law suits in forma pauperis. The matter has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the certified record and the plaintiff's brief, the panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

2

Plaintiff alleged in the district court that defendant sought to deprive him of equal protection and due process by filing a civil action against the plaintiff in state court in order to hinder plaintiff's performance in another federal law suit. The district court dismissed the action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d). Thereafter, the district court restrained the plaintiff from filing further law suits in forma pauperis without leave of the court. Plaintiff's motion for relief under Rule 60(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. was overruled.

3

Upon consideration, this court affirms the judgment of the district court denying relief for reasons stated in its order entered March 19, 1987.