Moffat Cnty. State Bank v. Producers Livestock Mktg. Ass'n, 833 F.2d 908 (10th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Moffat Cnty. State Bank v. Producers Livestock Mktg. Ass'n, 833 F.2d 908 (10th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Scholes v. Ames (ilnd, 1994-04-12) · Strongest negative: Wiand v. Waxenberg (flmd, 2009-03-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Wiand v. Waxenberg
M.D. Fla. · 2009 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Johnson v. Studholme, 619 F.Supp. 1347,1350 (D.Colo.1985) (holding that Ponzi scheme fund was not “ ‘injured’ by payments that were essential to its existence”), aff 'd, Johnson v. Hendricks, 833 F.2d 908 (10th Cir.1987).
cited Cited "see" Scholes v. Ames
N.D. Ill. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Johnson v. Studholme, 619 F.Supp. 1347, 1350 (D.Colo.1985), aff'd, 833 F.2d 908 (10th Cir.1987).
cited Cited "see, e.g." J.I. Case Credit Corporation v. Bobby Crites, and Rodney Timm
10th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Moffat County State Bank v. Producers Livestock Marketing Assoc., 598 F.Supp. 1562, 1568-70 (D.Colo.1984) (discussing the two lines of cases), aff’d, 833 F.2d 908 (10th Cir.1987). 3 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MOFFAT COUNTY STATE BANK, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PRODUCERS LIVESTOCK MARKETING ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee
85-1065.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Dec 1, 1987.
833 F.2d 908
Frederick J. Baumann, Denver, Colo. (Rothgerber, Appel, Powers & Johnson, Denver, Colo., were also on brief), for plaintiffs-appellants., David A. Packard, Boulder, Colo. (Hutchinson, Black, Hill & Cook, Boulder, Colo., were also on brief), for defendant-appellee.
Holloway, McKay, Logan.
Published
PER CURIAM.

This court has reviewed and considered the briefs and the oral argument in this case. Although states have dealt in different ways with the issue of what a party with a secured interest in livestock must do to retain that secured interest after the sale of the livestock, the federal government has now enacted legislation that will control the issues beginning December 23, 1986, See 7 U.S.C.A. § 1631. Considering the present law in Colorado for the cases still percolating through the system, the court concludes that the trial court’s order filed December 17, 1984, correctly weighs the facts and the law and adequately deals with the prior precedents, 598 F.Supp. 1562, and the judgment is accordingly

AFFIRMED.