Williams v. Lajewski-Pearson, 838 F.2d 1216 (6th Cir. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Williams v. Lajewski-Pearson, 838 F.2d 1216 (6th Cir. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Micrographics Systems, Inc. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc. (njd, 1993-06-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" National Micrographics Systems, Inc. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.
D.N.J. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Snider v. Lone Star Art Trading Co., 672 F.Supp. 977 (E.D.Mich.1987), aff'd, 838 F.2d 1216 (6th Cir.1988); Lulling v. Barnaby’s Family Inns, Inc., 482 F.Supp. 318 (E.D.Wis.1980). 10 Here, in contrast, the forum selection clause is found not in some peripheral agreement but in a dealer agreement, clearly a document vital to the relationship between the parties giving rise to this litigation.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harold Williams
v.
P. Lajewski-Pearson, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as the Resident Unit Manager at the Marquette Branch Prison, and Mike Kirkwood, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Sanitation Director at the Marquette Branch Prison
87-1785.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Feb 8, 1988.
838 F.2d 1216
Unpublished

838 F.2d 1216

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Harold WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
P. LAJEWSKI-PEARSON, Individually and in Her Official
Capacity as the Resident Unit Manager at the Marquette
Branch Prison, and Mike Kirkwood, Individually and in His
Official Capacity as the Sanitation Director at the
Marquette Branch Prison, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-1785.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 8, 1988.

1

Before NATHANIEL R. JONES and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and JOINER, District Judge.[*]

ORDER

2

This case has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

3

Upon review, we affirm the summary judgment of the district court. Plaintiff has failed to establish a constitutional violation under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 of his eighth amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.

4

Upon consideration, we hereby affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's memorandum opinion entered on July 17, 1987. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Charles W. Joiner, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation