green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Georgiadis
Y.1987), aff'd, mem. 847 F.2d 834 (2d Cir.1988), Judge Ward, in a well-reasoned opinion, found that private agreements of the parties, such as the customer agreements here in issue, "can validly modify the arbitration provisions of [an SRO] as they apply to the parties to such agreements." Id. at 966-67.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
PaineWebber Inc. v. Pitchford
In Creative Securities Corp. v. Bear Stearns & Co., 671 F.Supp. 961 (S.D.N.Y.1987), aff'd mem., 847 F.2d 834 (2d Cir.1988), Judge Ward, in a well-reasoned opinion, found that private agreements of the parties, such as the customer agreements here in issue, “can validly modify the arbitration provisions of [an SRO] as they apply to the parties to such agreements.” Id. at 966-67.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Pompano-Windy City Partners, Ltd. v. Bear, Stearns & Co.
Id. at 967-68 (emphasis added).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Falcone Bros. Partnership v. Bear Stearns & Co.
(3×)
The parties who were members of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) were bound by the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure which provided for arbitration of “ ‘any dispute, claim, or controversy arising out of or in connection with the business of any member.’ ” Id. at 966.
discussed
Cited "see"
Campaniello Imports, Ltd. v. Saporiti Italia S.P.A.
See Creative Securities Corp. v. Bear Stearns & Co., 671 F.Supp. 961 , 968 n. 11 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (finding claims against employees which "arise out of the employee relationship" are subject to arbitration clause in contract with principal), aff'd, 847 F.2d 834 (2d Cir.1988); Brener v. Becker Paribas Inc., 628 F.Supp. 442, 451 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Campaniello Imports, Ltd. v. Saporiti Italia S.p.A.
See Creative Securities Corp. v. Bear Stearns & Co., 671 F.Supp. 961 , 968 n. 11 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (finding claims against employees which “arise out of the employee relationship” are subject to arbitration clause in contract with principal), aff 'd, 847 F.2d 834 (2d Cir.1988); Brener v. Becker Paribas Inc., 628 F.Supp. 442, 451 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Kelley v. Benchmark Homes, Inc.
See Creative Securities Corp. v. Bear Stearns & Co., 671 F. Supp. 961 (S.D.N.Y. 1987), aff’d 847 F.2d 834 (2d Cir. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. Steinberg
“Under New York law, made applicable by [the Asset Purchase Agreement], the assignee of rights under a bilateral contract is not bound to perform the assignor’s duties unless he expressly assumes to do so.” Lachmar v. Trunkline LNG Co., 753 F.2d 8, 9-10 (2d Cir.1985); see 805 Third Avenue Co. v. Excel Marketing Enterprises Corp., 1987 WL 12822 at *3 (S.D.N.Y. 18 June 1987), aff'd, 847 F.2d 834 (2d Cir.1988); United States v. Panhandle Eastern Corp., 672 F.Supp. 149, 154 (D.Del.1987); Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 N.Y.2d 395, 402 , 165 N.Y.S.2d 498 , 144 N.E.2d 387 (1957)…
cited
Cited "see"
Roney & Company and Jacob Rivlin v. Jean Goren
See Creative Securities Corp. v. Bear Stearns & Co., 671 F.Supp. 961 , 966 n. 8 (S.D.N.Y. *1223 1987), aff'd mem., 847 F.2d 834 (2d Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fielding v. Index Futures Group, Inc.
(2×)
See Id. at 966-968 (absent clear intent to modify general arbitration clause provided by membership in an organization, party is bound to arbitrate all disputes that fall within that clause).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cutler
Third, but related, where a vague statute “abut[s] upon sensitive areas of basic First Amendment freedoms,” it “operates to inhibit the exercise of [those] freedoms.” Id at 108-09, 92 S.Ct. at 2298-99 (footnotes omitted); see also Amato v. County of Suffolk, 668 F.Supp. 151, 155 (E.D.N.Y.1987), aff'd, 847 F.2d 834 (2d Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Joanne Bembenista v. United States
See also Doe v. Scott, 652 F.Supp. 549, 550 (S.D.N.Y.1987), appeal dismissed, 847 F.2d 834 (2d Cir.1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Buitrago
v.
Ins
v.
Ins
88-4019.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Apr 15, 1988.
Published
Buitrago
v.
INS
NO. 88-4019
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
APR 15, 1988
1
Appeal From: I.N.S.
2
DISMISSED.