In Re Jerry Irwin Hochman, Debtor. United States of Am. v. Jerry Irwin Hochman, 853 F.2d 1547 (11th Cir. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Jerry Irwin Hochman, Debtor. United States of Am. v. Jerry Irwin Hochman, 853 F.2d 1547 (11th Cir. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
96 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fire-Trol Holdings, LLC v. United States (uscfc, 2005-10-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Fire-Trol Holdings, LLC v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2005 · confidence medium
Group, Inc. v. United States, 853 F.2d 1547, 1554 (Fed.Cir.1988).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Fire-Trol Holdings, LLC v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2005 · confidence medium
Group, Inc. v. United States, 853 F.2d 1547, 1554 (Fed.Cir.1988).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Phoenix Air Group, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2000 · confidence medium
Group, Inc. v. United States, 853 F.2d 1547, 1554 (Fed.Cir.1988) (citing H.R.
cited Cited as authority (rule) CCL, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1997 · confidence medium
Group, Inc. v. United States, 853 F.2d 1547, 1554 (Fed.Cir.1988). .
cited Cited as authority (rule) ATA Defense Industries, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1997 · confidence medium
Group, Inc. v. United States, 853 F.2d 1547, 1554 (Fed.Cir.1988).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Fund for Animals v. Babbitt
D.D.C. · 1995 · confidence medium
Doe v. Board of Educ. of Tullahoma City Schools, 9 F.3d 455, 460 (6th Cir.1993); SMS Data Products Group, Inc. v. United States, 853 F.2d 1547, 1553 (Fed.Cir.1988); Cape May Greene, Inc. v. Warren, 698 F.2d 179, 191 (3d Cir.1983).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Aerolease Long Beach v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1994 · confidence medium
Group, Inc. v. United States, 853 F.2d 1547, 1553 (Fed.Cir.1988); Isratex, Inc. v. United States, 25 Cl.Ct. 223, 227 (1992); Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 559, 566 (1991); PNM Constr., Inc. v. United States, 13 Cl.Ct. 745, 748 (1987); F. Alderete General Contractors, Inc. v. United States, A Cl.Ct. 482, 492 (1984).
cited Cited as authority (rule) SMS Data Products Group, Inc. v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1990 · confidence medium
Group, Inc. v. United States, 853 F.2d 1547, 1549 (Fed.Cir.1988) (SMS I).
examined Cited as authority (rule) SMS Data Products Group, Inc. v. United States (4×)
Ct. Cl. · 1989 · confidence medium
To the contrary, this court notes that the Federal Circuit reviewed the contract, SMS Data, 853 F.2d at 1548, 1549 , file memoranda, id. at 1549, 1550 , the Stipulation and Agreement, id. at 1549 , the testimony of witnesses before the Board, id. at 1550, 1552 , correspondence between the parties, id. at 1550, 1551, 1552 , and the Board’s opinion, id. at 1552-54 . .
discussed Cited "see" Charles v. United States (In Re Craine)
Bankr. M.D. Fla. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, In re Hochman, 853 F.2d 1547 (11th Cir.1988); In re Cleveland, 89 B.R. 69 (9th Cir. BAP 1988); United States v. Lee, 89 B.R. 250 (N.D.Ga.1987); In re Battrell, 105 B.R. 65 (Bankr.D.Or.1989); and In re Williams, 96 B.R. 149 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1989).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Palantir Usg, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2016 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., SMS Data Products Grp. v. United States, 853 F.2d 1547 (Fed.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Walton v. Sallie Mae Education Credit Finance Corp. (In Re Walton)
Bankr. S.D. Ind. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Lee, 89 B.R. 250, 257 (N.D.Ga.1987), aff'd, United States v. Hochman (In re Hochman), 853 F.2d 1547 (11th Cir.1988) (determination of dischargeability of student loan debt prior to “successful completion of all payments under a Chapter 13 Plan” is “premature”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mason v. Young (In Re Young)
10th Cir. BAP · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Hochman (In re Hochman), 853 F.2d 1547 (11th Cir.1988) (affirming per curiam the district court which held that § 1330(a) was both a time and substantive limitation on revocation); Lester Mobile Home Sales, Inc. v. Woods (In re Woods), 130 B.R. 204, 205 (W.D.Va.1990); United States v. Trembath (In re Trembath), 205 B.R. 909, 915 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1997); Rakestraw v. Hood (In re Hood), 211 B.R. 334, 335 (Bankr.W.D.Ark.1997); Laurel Fed.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." CCL Service Corp. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Although jurisdiction may be broadened through legislation, the “waiver of immunity and creation of jurisdiction must be qualified by any conditions that Congress has placed on them.” Bailey, 160 F.3d at 1363 ; see, e.g., SMS Data Prods., Group, Inc. v. United States, 853 F.2d 1547 , 1555 n. * (Fed.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Barrows v. Illinois Student Assistance Commission (In Re Barrows)
Bankr. D.N.H. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also U.S. v. Lee, 89 B.R. 250, 255-256 (N.D.Ga.1987), aff'd, In re Hochman, 853 F.2d 1547 (11th Cir.1988); In re Green, 82 B.R. 955, 957 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Young v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Young)
S.D. Ind. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Lee, 89 B.R. 250, 256 (N.D.Ga.1987), aff'd per curiam, 853 F.2d 1547 (11th Cir.1988) (a court may not revoke or vacate a Chapter 13 confirmation order absent allegations of fraud), In re Walker, 114 B.R. 847, 851 (Bkrtcy., N.D.N.Y.1990) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re Jerry Irwin Hochman, Debtor. United States of America
v.
Jerry Irwin Hochman
87-8744.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Sep 6, 1988.
853 F.2d 1547
Published

853 F.2d 1547

In re Jerry Irwin HOCHMAN, Debtor.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jerry Irwin HOCHMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-8744
Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Sept. 6, 1988.

Jonathan I. Sbar, Atlanta, Ga., for cross-appellant.

Myles E. Eastwood, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for cross-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Before TJOFLAT, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated by the district court in its Order of July 23, 1987, reported at 89 B.R. 250.