Michael J. Schifanelli v. United States, 865 F.2d 1259 (4th Cir. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Michael J. Schifanelli v. United States, 865 F.2d 1259 (4th Cir. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rywelski v. Biden (ca10, 2024-05-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Rywelski v. Biden
10th Cir. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Schifanelli v. U.S. Gov’t, 865 F.2d 1259 (4th Cir. 1989) (unpublished; per curiam) (“The Declaration of Independence is a statement of ideals, not law.”); see also Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 37 U.S. 657, 680 (1838) (“[U]nder the 5 Appellate Case: 23-5099 Document: 010111041417 Date Filed: 05/01/2024 Page: 6 constitution [the court] is bound by events subsequent to the declaration of independence . . . .”).
cited Cited "see" SWEPI, LP v. Mora County
D.N.M. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Schifanelli v. U.S. Gov’t, No. 88-2172, 865 F.2d 1259 , at *1 (“The Declaration of Independence is a statement of ideals, not law.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Navarro v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
S.D. Cal. · 2019 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Schoo v. United 9 || States Postal Service, 865 F.2d 1259 , 1988 WL 142904, at *2 (4th Cir. 1988) (“a 10 || supervisory employee of a local post office is not such an official” within the meaning of 11 ||Rule 15(c)(2)); see also Dacus v. United States Postal Service, 1987 WL 14368 , at *2 (S.D. 12 June 15, 1987) (“Service on a local post office official is not equivalent to service on 13 Postmaster General.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael J. Schifanelli
v.
United States
88-3622.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jan 24, 1989.
865 F.2d 1259
Unpublished

865 F.2d 1259
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael J. SCHIFANELLI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 88-3622.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 29, 1988.
Decided: Dec. 22, 1988.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 24, 1989.

Michael J. Schifanelli, appellant pro se.

David Paul King, Billy S. Bradley (Office of the United States Attorney), for appellee.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Michael J. Schifanelli appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint as frivolous. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. At no time has appellant presented any facts or law supporting his claim that the United States Government committed an illegal act by making monetary gain its objective. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Schifanelli v. United States of America, C/A No. 88-2584 (D.Md. Sept. 1, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in this material before the Court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.