State of Oklahoma v. Graham, 873 F.2d 1387 (10th Cir. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
State of Oklahoma v. Graham, 873 F.2d 1387 (10th Cir. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“until the appellants exhaust their administrative remedies, thereby allowing the agency officially to formulate its approach to the relevant regulations, we believe that the issues presented by this action will not be ripe for adjudication.”
33 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: GARTEN v. MARIANNA WARDEN (flnd, 2023-02-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) GARTEN v. MARIANNA WARDEN
N.D. Fla. · 2023 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
one of the primary purposes in requiring plaintiffs to exhaust their administrative remedies is to assure that the courts review ripe controversies, presenting concrete injuries.
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Broadcast Equities, Inc. v. Montgomery County
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1998 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
until the appellants exhaust their administrative remedies, thereby allowing the agency officially to formulate its approach to the relevant regulations, we believe that the issues presented by this action will not be ripe for adjudication.
examined Cited as authority (rule) Freeman v. Cavazos (4×) also: Cited "see"
D.D.C. · 1990 · confidence medium
Rogers, 873 F.2d at 1394 (emphasis in original and footnote omitted).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cannata v. Department of Environmental Protection
Conn. · 1990 · confidence medium
Rogers v. Bennett, 873 F.2d 1387, 1392-93 (11th Cir. 1989); Accion Social de Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Viera Perez, 831 F.2d 365, 371 (1st Cir. 1987); Avoyelles Sportsmen’s League, Inc. v. Marsh, 715 F.2d 897 , 918-19 (5th Cir. 1983); Deltona Corporation v. Alexander, 682 F.2d 888 , 893 (11th Cir. 1982); Shawnee Coal Co. v. Andrus, 661 F.2d 1083, 1093 (6th Cir. 1981); West v. Bergland, 611 F.2d 710, 719 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 821 , 101 S. Ct. 79 , 66 L.
examined Cited "see" Weber v. Cranston Public School Committee (3×)
D.R.I. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rogers v. Bennett, 873 F.2d 1387, 1390 (11th Cir.1989).
cited Cited "see" Alabama Dairy Products Association, Inc. v. Clayton Yeutter
11th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rogers v. Bennett, 873 F.2d 1387, 1396 (11th Cir.1989).
cited Cited "see" Alabama Dairy Products Ass'n v. Yeutter
11th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rogers v. Bennett, 873 F.2d 1387, 1396 (11th Cir.1989).
cited Cited "see" Freeman v. Cavazos
11th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rogers, 873 F.2d at 1393-96 .
cited Cited "see" Freeman v. Cavazos
11th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rogers, 873 F.2d at 1393-96 .
discussed Cited "see" Freeman v. Cavazos (2×)
11th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rogers v. Bennett, 873 F.2d 1387, 1393-96 (11th Cir.1989).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Freeman (2×)
11th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rogers v. Bennett, 873 F.2d 1387, 1393-96 (11th Cir.1989). 4 On April 26, 1990, the administrative proceedings ultimately concluded in favor of the Department.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Burgos v. Chertoff Ex Rel. United States Department of Homeland Security
S.D. Fla. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Rogers v. Bennett, 873 F.2d 1387, 1391 (11th Cir.1989).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Holton v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of South Carolina
M.D. Ala. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Panola Land Buyers Ass’n v. Shuman, 762 F.2d 1550 , 1556 (11th Cir.1985); see also Rogers v. Bennett, 873 F.2d 1387, 1393 (11th Cir.1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission, Tax Commission
v.
Jan Graham, and Chickasaw Nation by and Through Overton James, Governor of the Chickasaw Nation
86-1655.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
May 11, 1989.
873 F.2d 1387
Published

873 F.2d 1387

STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, Tax
Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jan GRAHAM, and Chickasaw Nation By and Through Overton
James, Governor of the Chickasaw Nation,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-1655.

United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.

May 11, 1989.

Before SEYMOUR, MOORE and TACHA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The court's opinion affirming the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma was filed in the captioned case on May 18, 1988, 846 F.2d 1258. On March 29, 1989, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed this court's judgment, with costs, and remanded the cause for further proceeding in conformity with the Supreme Court's opinion, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 1519, 103 L.Ed.2d 924.

In consideration whereof, the court orders as follows:

1. The mandate issued June 9, 1988, to United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma is recalled and the court's judgment of May 18, 1988 is vacated.

[*~1387]1

2. The judgment of the United States District Court for Eastern District of Oklahoma is vacated and the district court is directed to return this case to the State District Court in Murray County, Oklahoma.

[*~1391]2

3. Further the Oklahoma Tax Commission shall recover from Jan Graham, et al $669.85 as costs expended before the Supreme Court of the United States as ordered by that Court.

[*~1395]3

4. The clerk shall transmit a certified copy of this order to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma as and for the mandate.