In Re William D. Kraemer, Debtor. William D. Kraemer v. Glynn H. Crook, Cynthia M. Crook, 873 F.2d 1406 (11th Cir. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re William D. Kraemer, Debtor. William D. Kraemer v. Glynn H. Crook, Cynthia M. Crook, 873 F.2d 1406 (11th Cir. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Duff v. Postell (In re Postell) (gad, 1991-09-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Duff v. Postell (In re Postell)
D. Ga. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kraemer v. Crook, 94 B.R. 207 (N.D.Ga.1988), aff'd mem. 873 F.2d 1406 (11th Cir.1989).
cited Cited "see" Blashke v. Standard (In Re Standard)
Bankr. N.D. Ga. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kraemer v. Crook, 94 B.R. 207, 208 (N.D.Ga.1988), aff 'd. mem. 873 F.2d 1406 (11th Gir.1989) (citing Angelle v. Reed (In re Angelle), 610 F.2d 1335 (5th Cir.1980)).
cited Cited "see" American General Finance, Inc. v. Heath (In Re Heath)
Bankr. N.D. Ga. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kraemer v. Crook, 94 B.R. 207 (N.D.Ga.1988), aff'd, 873 F.2d 1406 (11th Cir.1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re William D. Kraemer, Debtor. William D. Kraemer
v.
Glynn H. Crook, Cynthia M. Crook
88-8839.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
May 24, 1989.
873 F.2d 1406
Published

873 F.2d 1406

In re William D. KRAEMER, Debtor.
William D. KRAEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Glynn H. CROOK, Cynthia M. Crook, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-8839
Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

May 24, 1989.

Tash J. Van Dora, Savell & Williams, S. Lester Tate, III, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

William Eugene Otwell, Austell, Ga., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; J. Owen Forrester, Judge.

Before TJOFLAT, FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

We affirm the district court's judgment for the reasons stated in its dispositive order of October 4, 1988. See Kraemer v. Crook, 94 B.R. 207 (N.D.Ga.1988).

2

AFFIRMED.