Dominic Paolillo, Lucy Wadsworth & Robert F. Grady v. Dresser Indus., Inc., 884 F.2d 707 (2d Cir. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Dominic Paolillo, Lucy Wadsworth & Robert F. Grady v. Dresser Indus., Inc., 884 F.2d 707 (2d Cir. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kamine/Besicorp Allegany L.P. v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. (nywd, 1995-11-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Kamine/Besicorp Allegany L.P. v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. (2×)
W.D.N.Y. · 1995 · confidence medium
The court granted summary judgment for the insurer, stating that the insurer was “simply acting as a rational buyer attempting to get the best possible terms for its subscribers.” Id. at 713.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Lowe v. Commack Union Free School District
2d Cir. · 1989 · confidence medium
The amended opinion states "[w]e believe that the court's use of the word 'real' was confusing in that it failed to explain to the jury that age need not be the principal reason for [the employer's] decision ..., but only a factor that made a difference." Paolillo, 884 F.2d at 707. 69 The district court here cannot be faulted for following a recent decision of this Court and not anticipating a subsequent amendment to the opinion.
discussed Cited "see" Discon, Incorporated v. Nynex Corporation, Nynex Material Enterprises, New York Telephone Company, Robert J. Eckenrode, and Bernard O'Reilly
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Westchester Radiological Associates v. Empire Blue Cross and Blue *1060 Shield, Inc., 707 F.Supp. 708, 712-13 (S.D.N.Y.) (“antitrust remedy” does not apply “where a buyer insists on buying his services through an intermediary”), aff'd on opinion below, 884 F.2d 707 , 708 (2d Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1095 , 110 S.Ct. 1169 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" Ronna ZAKEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bonnie BOERER, Defendant-Appellee
2d Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Paolillo v. Dresser Indus., Inc., 865 F.2d 37, 40 (in age discrimination action instruction that jury must find that “ ‘the real reason for the decision was the plaintiff’s age’ ” constituted reversible error), modified, 884 F.2d 707 (2d Cir.1989).
discussed Cited "see" Folger Adam Company v. Pmi Industries, Inc., Control Systems Corporation, Wedge Group, Inc., and Salomon Brothers Inc.
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Paolillo v. Dresser Indus., Inc., 865 F.2d 37, 40 (2d Cir.), modified on other grounds, 884 F.2d 707 (2d Cir.1989) (finding a jury charge erroneous because it could not be said for certain that it did not cause the jury to apply the wrong legal standard); Norfleet v. Isthmian Lines, Inc., 355 F.2d 359, 362-63 (2d Cir.1966) (“The appellate function of this court is to satisfy itself that instructions ... show no tendency to confuse or mislead the jury as to the principles of law which are applicable.”) (emphasis added). 7 Our conclusion that the charge in this case was erroneous is not …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dominic PAOLILLO, Lucy Wadsworth and Robert F. Grady, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee
88-7527.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Sep 13, 1989.
884 F.2d 707
Feinberg, Meskill, Kearse.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

The order entered in the above referenced appeal on February 15, 1989, erroneously failed to include language amending the opinion. At the direction of the panel, that order is now amended to include the following two paragraphs:

It is further ordered that the opinion be amended in the following respect:
At slip op. 797, last line (865 F.2d 37, 40, second column, line 21) — delete “significant contributing” before “factor” and add “that made a difference” after “factor”.

SO ORDERED.