In Re Thomas F. Carmichael, 887 F.2d 1095 (Fed. Cir. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Thomas F. Carmichael, 887 F.2d 1095 (Fed. Cir. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: CellTrust Corporation v. ionLake, LLC (mnd, 2022-09-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) CellTrust Corporation v. ionLake, LLC
D. Minnesota · 2022 · confidence medium
Servs., Inc. v. Uarco Inc., 887 F.2d 1095, 1 (Fed.
cited Cited "see" Emmanuel Ayala v. United States Postal Service
MSPB · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
ID at 1; see O’Neal v. U.S. Postal Service, 39 M.S.P.R. 645 , 649, aff’d, 887 F.2d 1095 (Fed.
discussed Cited "see" Michael Beech v. Department of the Air Force
MSPB · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See O’Neal v. U.S. Postal Service, 39 M.S.P.R. 645 , 649 (dismissing an appeal without a hearing when the appellant failed to raise a nonfrivolous allegation of jurisdiction and the jurisdictional issue could be resolved on written submissions), aff’d, 887 F.2d 1095 (Fed.
cited Cited "see" Amazon. Com, Inc. v. Barnesandnoble. Com, Inc.
W.D. Wash. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Polaroid Graphics Imaging, Inc., 706 F.Supp. 1135, 1146 (D.Del.1989), aff'd 887 F.2d 1095 (Fed.Cir.1989).
cited Cited "see" Amazon.com, Inc. v. Barnesandnoble.com, Inc.
W.D. Wash. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Polaroid Graphics Imaging, Inc., 706 F.Supp. 1135, 1146 (D.Del.1989), aff'd 887 F.2d 1095 (Fed.Cir.1989).
discussed Cited "see" Ultradent Products, Inc. v. Life-Like Cosmetics, Inc.
D. Utah · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Polaroid Graphics Imaging, Inc., 706 F.Supp. 1135, 1142 (D.Del.) (“any degree of physical difference, however slight, invalidates claims of anticipation”), aff'd, 887 F.2d 1095 (Fed.Cir.1989).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. IVAX Corp.
E.D.N.Y · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Polaroid Graphics Imaging, Inc., 706 F.Supp. 1135, 1141 (D.Del.), aff'd without op., 887 F.2d 1095 , 1989 WL 108217 (Fed.Cir.1989); CVI/Beta Ventures, Inc. v. Custom Optical Frames, Inc., 893 F.Supp. 508, 514 (D.Md.1995), aff 'd, 1996 WL 338388 , 92 F.3d 1203 (Fed.Cir.1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." American Permahedge, Inc. v. Barcana, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
“There must be no difference between the claimed invention and the referenced disclosure, as viewed by a person of ordinary skill in the field of the invention.” Scripps Clinic & Research Found, v. Genentech, Inc., 927 F.2d at 1576; see also E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Polaroid Graphics Imaging, Inc., 706 F.Supp. 1135, 1142 (D.Del.1989), aff'd, 887 F.2d 1095 (Fed.Cir.1989) (“all of the same elements [must be] found in exactly the same situation and united in the same way ... in a single prior art reference”) (quoting Perkin Elmer Corp. v. Computervision, Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 894 (…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re Thomas F. Carmichael
89-1248.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Oct 23, 1989.
887 F.2d 1095
Unpublished

887 F.2d 1095

13 U.S.P.Q.2d 1735

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
In re Thomas F. CARMICHAEL.

No. 89-1248.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 20, 1989.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 23, 1989.

Before BISSELL, Circuit Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge.

DECISION

1

This is an appeal by Carmichael from a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (board), in Appeal No. 88-2441 issued November 3, 1988. Prior to the board's decision before us in this appeal, this court reversed a decision of the board and awarded priority to Burson. Burson v. Carmichael, 731 F.2d 849, 221 USPQ 664 (Fed.Cir.1984). Thereafter, in the ex parte prosecution of Carmichael's application, the board affirmed the examiner's rejection of a number of Carmichael's claims on the ground that the subject matter of the counts lost in the interference as a result of this court's decision were prior art against Carmichael's claims. The board also affirmed the examiner's rejection of the claims on the general ground of interference estoppel. Because the rejection of Carmichael's application under the equitable doctrine of interference estoppel was proper, we affirm the board's decision. Accordingly, we do not reach the issue raised by the board's rejection based on 35 U.S.C. Sections 102(g) and 103.