Morris Mech. Enter., Inc. v. The United States, 904 F.2d 45 (Fed. Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Morris Mech. Enter., Inc. v. The United States, 904 F.2d 45 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
115 citation events (28 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Omeprazole Patent Litigation (nysd, 2001-07-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" In Re Omeprazole Patent Litigation
S.D.N.Y. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Drexelbrook Controls, Inc. v. Magnetrol Int’l, Inc., 720 F.Supp. 397, 407 (D.Del.1989) (“[t]he requisite intent may be inferred from all the circumstances.”), aff'd, 904 F.2d 45 (Fed.Cir.1990).
discussed Cited "see" Howard v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cummings v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 475, 479 (1989), aff'd, 904 F.2d 45 (Fed.Cir.1990) (“[I]n order for a claim against the United States founded on statute or regulation to be successful, the provisions relied upon must be contain language which could fairly be interpreted as mandating recovery of compensation from the government.”) (citations omitted).
cited Cited "see" Godley v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Colorado State Bank of Walsh v. United States, 18 Cl.Ct. 611, 629 (1989), aff’d mem., 904 F.2d 45 (Fed.Cir.1990). .
discussed Cited "see" Pennco Trucking Inc. v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haber v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 496, 504-05 (1989) (failure to identify Internal Revenue Service personnel barred plaintiff from relying on their alleged representations), aff'd, 904 F.2d 45 (Fed.Cir.1990) (per curiam) (unpubl.).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bannum, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Corp. v. United States, 53 Fed.Cl. 420, 435 (2002); see also Optimal Data Corp. v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 723, 731 (1989), aff'd, 904 F.2d 45 (Fed.Cir.1990) (table); 1A Corbin, Contracts § 259 at 464 (1963 ed.).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Harriman v. United States Department of Agriculture
D. Me. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Nelson v. United States, 16 Cl.Ct. 510 , 514 n. 4 (1989) (administrative provisions of subchapter IV); see also Cummings v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 475, 479 (1989) (emergency loan provisions of subchapter II, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1970 ), aff'd on other grounds, 904 F.2d 45 (Fed.Cir.1990) (unpublished); Campbell v. United States, 16 Cl.Ct. 690, 696 (1989) (several regulations of the operating loan provisions of subchapter II, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1941-1949 ); Hanson v. United States, 13 Cl.Ct. 519, 527-28 (1987) (emergency loan provisions of subchapter II, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1970 ), aff'd, 861 F.2d…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Union Bank & Trust Co. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Colorado State Bank v. United States, 18 Cl.Ct. 611 (1989), aff'd, 904 F.2d 45 (Fed.Cir.1990) (Table).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Black and Decker, Inc. v. Hoover Service Center
D. Conn. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
Robertson, Co. v. United Steel Deck, Inc., 820 F.2d 384, 387 (Fed.Cir.1987); see also Drexelbrook Controls, Inc. v. Magnetrol Int’l, Inc., 720 F.Supp. 397, 400 (D.Del.1989), aff 'd, 904 F.2d 45 (Fed.Cir.1990).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Amos v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Haber v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 496 (1989), aff'd 904 F.2d 45 (Fed.Cir.1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morris Mechanical Enterprises, Inc.
v.
The United States
90-1056.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
May 11, 1990.
904 F.2d 45
Unpublished

904 F.2d 45

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
MORRIS MECHANICAL ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Appellee.

No. 90-1056.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 11, 1990.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, JACK R. MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, and WILLIAM D. BROWNING, District Judge[*]:

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

1

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

*

Judge William D. Browning of the District of Arizona, sitting by designation