United States v. James Allen Patterson, 908 F.2d 974 (6th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. James Allen Patterson, 908 F.2d 974 (6th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
60 citation events (33 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Transco Lines, Inc. v. Extra Logistics, Inc. (ilnd, 2019-01-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Transco Lines, Inc. v. Extra Logistics, Inc.
N.D. Ill. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Hanover Am. Ins. Co. v. Tattooed Millionaire Ent.
6th Cir. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Id.; see also Tate v. Trialco Scrap, Inc., 908 F.2d 974, at *3 (6th Cir. 1990) (table) (applying Tennessee law and discussing EVCO and St.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Genesis Insurance v. Alfi
S.D. Ohio · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., West American Insurance Co. v. Potts, 908 F.2d 974 , 1990 WL 104034, at *2 (6th Cir.1990) (“Foremost consideration must be given to the plaintiffs choice of forum”); Nicol v. Koscinski, 188 F.2d 537, 537 (6th Cir.1951) (motion to transfer properly granted when the balance weighs strongly in favor of transfer); Hanning v. New England Mutual Life Insurance, 710 F.Supp. 213, 214 (S.D.Ohio 1989)(same); Midwest Motor Supply Co. Inc. v. Kimball, 761 F.Supp. 1316 (S.D.Ohio 1991)(plaintiffs choice of forum given considerable weight); cf. International Union, U.A.W. v. Aluminum Co. of Am…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hanover Insurance v. Honeywell, Inc.
N.D. Okla. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Tate v. Trialco Scrap, Inc., 745 F.Supp. 458, 473 (M.D.Tenn.1989), aff'd 908 F.2d 974 , 1990 WL 98032 (6th Cir.1990). 3 The Oklahoma Court of Appeals, re-affirming Sutton , has again recently precluded a lessor’s insurer from asserting a subrogation claim against the tenant in Kansas City Fire & Marine Ins.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Carter v. Russo Realtors, Unpublished Decision (5-22-2001)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, Troy v. Suburban Management Corp. (C.A.6, 1990), 908 F.2d 974 (applying McDonnell Douglas analysis to housing discrimination).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Lexington Insurance v. Raboin
Del. Super. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Tate v. Trialco Scrap, Inc., M.D.Tenn., 745 F.Supp. 458, 474 (1989), aff'd, 908 F.2d 974 (1990); Alaska Ins.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Great American Insurance Company v. Cahill, No. Cv95-0372249 (Jun. 24, 1997)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Tate v. Trialco Scrap, Inc., 745 F. Sup. 458 (M.D.Tenn. 1989) [aff'd 908 F.2d 974 (1990)]; Alaska Insurance Co. v. RCA Alaska Communications, Inc., 623 P.2d 1216 (Alaska 1981); Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Auto Spring Supply Co., 59 Cal.App.3d 860 , 131 Cal.Rptr. 211 (1976) . . .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
James Allen Patterson
89-3785.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Jul 30, 1990.
908 F.2d 974
Unpublished

908 F.2d 974

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Allen PATTERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-3785.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 30, 1990.

1

Before KEITH and RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judges, and RICHARD A. ENSLEN, District Judge.[*]

ORDER

2

James Allen Patterson, a pro se federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying his rule 35(a) motion in which he challenged the imposition of a five year period of supervised release. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

3

Seeking a reduction in his sentence, Patterson filed a Rule 35(a) motion claiming that the court was without authority to impose a 5 year supervised release period as part of his sentence.

4

The district court denied the motion concluding that the five year term was authorized under the law in effect at the time of Patterson's conviction and sentence. Patterson has filed a timely appeal from this order.

5

Upon review, we affirm the district court's judgment. The provisions of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3559 in effect at the time of Patterson's sentencing establish his offense as a Class B felony. A period of supervised release for a Class B felony is expressly authorized under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583. A term of three to five years supervised release is in fact mandated under the Sentencing Guidelines. See U.S.Sent.Guidelines Sec. 5D3.1 and Sec. 5D3.2.

6

Accordingly, the district court's judgment is hereby affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Richard A. Enslen, U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation