William C. Baker v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 915 F.2d 1585 (Fed. Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
William C. Baker v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 915 F.2d 1585 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Adams v. United States (uscfc, 1998-10-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Adams v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1998 · signal: accord · confidence high
In general, “a claim does not accrue until the claimant has suffered damages.” Terteling v. United States, 167 Ct.Cl. 331, 338 , 334 F.2d 250, 254 (1964); accord Chipps v. United States, 19 Cl.Ct. 201, 203 (1990), aff'd, 915 F.2d 1585 (Fed.Cir.1990) (Table).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William C. Baker
v.
Office of Personnel Management
90-3326.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Sep 27, 1990.
915 F.2d 1585
Unpublished

915 F.2d 1585

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
William C. BAKER, Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 90-3326.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 27, 1990.

Before RICH, Circuit Judge, and SKELTON and BALDWIN, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The initial decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board), dated November 30, 1989, which became final on March 30, 1990, Docket No. AT831E89010050, dismissing as untimely William C. Baker's appeal from a reconsideration decision of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), because Baker neither filed his appeal within the 25-day time limit governing appeals, 5 C.F.R. Sec. 831.110, nor demonstrated good cause for his delay, is affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the Administrative Judge of the Board.