Norwood Mfg., Inc. v. The United States, 930 F.2d 38 (Fed. Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Norwood Mfg., Inc. v. The United States, 930 F.2d 38 (Fed. Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“one who seeks to pirate an invention, like one who seeks to pirate a copyrighted book or play, may be expected to introduce minor variations to conceal and shelter the piracy”
37 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Learning Resources, Inc. v. Playgo Toys Enterprises Ltd. (ilnd, 2020-04-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Learning Resources, Inc. v. Playgo Toys Enterprises Ltd.
N.D. Ill. · 2020 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
one who seeks to pirate an invention, like one who seeks to pirate a copyrighted book or play, may be expected to introduce minor variations to conceal and shelter the piracy
cited Cited "see" James A. Long v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General
2d Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Long v. United States Postal Serv., 930 F.2d 38 (Fed.Cir.1991).
cited Cited "see" Mega Construction Co. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Norwood Mfg., Inc. v. United States, 21 Cl.Ct. 300, 309-10 (1990), aff'd, 930 F.2d 38 (Fed.Cir. 1991). 6.
cited Cited "see" William L. Tanksley v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Fed. Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carreon v. Office of Personnel Management, 46 M.S.P.R. 16 , 19-20 (1990), aff'd, 930 F.2d 38 (Fed.Cir.1991) (Table).
cited Cited "see" Mercedes L. Vda De Rabo v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Fed. Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Norwood Manufacturing, Inc.
v.
The United States
90-5155.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Mar 11, 1991.
930 F.2d 38

930 F.2d 38

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
NORWOOD MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-5155.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 11, 1991.

Before MAYER, PLAGER and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.