John Wesley Stewart v. David A. Smith, J.M. Perutelli, John Does, R.G. Picarella, Marsha Altizer, 937 F.2d 603 (4th Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
John Wesley Stewart v. David A. Smith, J.M. Perutelli, John Does, R.G. Picarella, Marsha Altizer, 937 F.2d 603 (4th Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
74 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. White (wva, 2011-08-18) · Strongest negative: Steinle v. Boeing Co. (ksd, 1992-02-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "but see" Steinle v. Boeing Co.
D. Kan. · 1992 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Watkins v. Bessemer State Technical College, 782 F.Supp. 581, 586 (N.D.Ala.1992) (“This court can conceive of no reason for the Supreme Court to vacate and remand Gers-man unless the Supreme Court believes, as does this court, that the Civil Rights Act of 1991 effectively eliminates the effect of Patterson even in cases which preceded that Act.”) See also Holland v. First Virginia Banks, Inc., 937 F.2d 603 (4th Cir.1991), ce rt. granted, judgment vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1152 , 117 L.Ed.2…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. White
W. Va. · 2011 · confidence medium
Further, the Court in Burney found the "[f]actors relevant to the determination of the defendant's subjective expectation of privacy in the particular area searched include ownership of the items seized, evidence of the defendant's desire to keep the items seized private, and the defendant's presence or absence at the time of the search." U.S. v. Burney, 937 F.2d at 603.
discussed Cited "see" ca9 2005
9th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Farrar, 506 U.S. at 120 , 113 S.Ct. 566 (O'Connor, J., concurring) (" Every nominal damage award has as its basis a finding of liability, but obviously many such victories are Pyrrhic ones.") (quoting Lawrence v. Hinton, 937 F.2d 603 (4th Cir.1991)).
discussed Cited "see" Benton v. Oregon Student Assistance Commission
9th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Farrar, 506 U.S. at 120 , 113 S.Ct. 566 (O’Connor, J., concurring) (“Every nominal damage award has as its basis a finding of liability, but obviously many such victories are Pyrrhic ones.”) (quoting Lawrence v. Hinton, 937 F.2d 603 (4th Cir.1991)).
discussed Cited "see" Grier v. Titan Corp.
E.D. Va. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lawrence v. Hinton, 937 F.2d 603 , 1991 WL 125471 , *4 (4th Cir.1991) (affirming Denny v. Hinton, 131 F.R.D. 659, 665 (M.D.N.C.1990)); Crossman v. Marcoccio, 806 F.2d 329, 333-34 (1st Cir.1986); see also Said v. Virginia Commonwealth University/Medical College of Virginia, 130 F.R.D. 60, 63 (E.D.Va.1990).
John Wesley Stewart
v.
David A. Smith, J.M. Perutelli, John Does, R.G. Picarella, Marsha Altizer
91-6757.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jul 9, 1991.
937 F.2d 603
Unpublished

937 F.2d 603
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
John Wesley STEWART, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David A. SMITH, J.M. Perutelli, John Does, R.G. Picarella,
Marsha Altizer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-6757.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 30, 1991.
Decided July 9, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-90-136-R)

John Wesley Stewart, appellant pro se.

Jeanette Dian Rogers, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Edward Meade Macon, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

John Wesley Stewart appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stewart v. Smith, CA-90-136-R (W.D.Va. Nov. 29, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.